2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Grounded Theory to Inform the Human-Centered Design of Digital Health in Geriatric Palliative Care

Abstract: Context. Digital health offers innovative mechanisms to engage in palliative care, yet digital systems are typically designed for individual users, rather than integrating the patient's caregiving ''social convoy'' (i.e., family members, friends, neighbors, formal caregiving supports) to maximize benefit. As older adults with serious illness increasingly rely on the support of others, there is a need to foster effective integration of the social convoy in digitally supported palliative care. Objectives. Conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 27 reports, the 3 most common designs were singlearm intervention studies (9; 33%) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], reviews (6; 22.2%) [3,[26][27][28][29][30], and qualitative studies (4; 14.8%) [31][32][33][34]. The remainder were cohort, cross-sectional studies or reports / expert opinions [35][36][37][38][39][40][41], with only one randomised controlled study [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the 27 reports, the 3 most common designs were singlearm intervention studies (9; 33%) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], reviews (6; 22.2%) [3,[26][27][28][29][30], and qualitative studies (4; 14.8%) [31][32][33][34]. The remainder were cohort, cross-sectional studies or reports / expert opinions [35][36][37][38][39][40][41], with only one randomised controlled study [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptability was described as a specific outcome in 24 (89%) of the 27 studies analysed [3, 17-31, 33-35, 37, 39-42]. The assessment tools were more heterogeneous than those used for feasibility; four were validated questionnaires [19,21,22,42], and the rest were interviews [18,25,[32][33][34]40] and purpose-built questionnaires. The definition of acceptability was more variable, mostly referring to three themes: general satisfaction, positive acceptance as a communication tool and not inferior to physical visits.…”
Section: Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these eight studies, one study acknowledged to the participant they had committed an error but did not provide feedback 43 and another study acknowledged it as a study limitation that they did not review results with participants. 40 Seven studies reached learning level 2—mutual learning, using transference of knowledge that focused on prior experience with the technology. This benefitted both researchers and participants, indicating a bidirectional flow of knowledge occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the target, the popularization and promotion of digitalization is the goal proposed from the overall governance level. Community staff should actively connect with the elderly, provide digital tools, improve their digital health literacy, and integrate the elderly into the digital society [85]. Community health is the goal of the digital transformation of health care.…”
Section: Digital Technology Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%