Using groupwork in the designing and playing of board games in occupational health and safety

Singh, Penny; Niranjan, Ivan Gunass

doi:10.1921/095182412x66218

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Board games, on the other hand, have been used to increase empathy and collaborative attitudes [10][11][12] , and enhance learning and knowledge 12,13 . Using a preexisting board game reduces the time commitment needed to design a game from scratch and is relatively inexpensive and accessible in comparison to escape rooms.…”

Section: Games As a Tool For Collaborative Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pilot Project Exploring Low-tech Collaborative Board Gaming on Student Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Education

Stark

Opuda²

2022

Hypothesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The intent of this project was to explore the impact of a small, collaborative gaming experience among undergraduate students on student attitudes and beliefs about Interprofessional Education (IPE). Methods: Health sciences librarians at two state universities used a low-tech, collaborative board game to facilitate small, in-person group gaming. The authors used an adapted version of the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS), a validated instrument that measures the four domains of the 2011 IPEC Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, as a pre/post assessment of the impact of the gaming experience. Results: While anecdotal evidence indicated that playing a collaborative board game had an impact on the participating students, there was no statistically based evidence that collaborative board games increases positive or negative attitudes about IPE and interprofessional collaborative practice. Conclusions: More student participation is required for statistical significance, recruiting students and ensuring that students have enough time to complete the game play is key to future possible success.

show abstract

Section: Games As a Tool For Collaborative Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pilot Project Exploring Low-tech Collaborative Board Gaming on Student Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Education

Stark

Opuda²

2022

Hypothesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Five studies involved stakeholders in the Product Design Phase. Three of them only involved stakeholders in Ideation of the Product Design Phase, where a product was generated based on their comments, suggestions or guidelines [34,35,37]. Two other studies involved stakeholders in both Ideation and Embodiment of the Product Design Phase [4,36].…”

Section: Product Design Ideation Embodimentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies that involved stakeholders in the Product Design Phase were of low methodological quality. Results suggested enhanced knowledge about health (e.g., about AIDS) [35,36]. A study that focused on discussions regarding obesity suggested a doubled discussion time between domain experts, end-users and family, and improved self-efficacy of domain experts in doing this [34].…”

Section: Studies Which Involved Stakeholders Only In Either the Problmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personalization in Game Design for Healthcare: a Literature Review on its Definitions and Effects

Dooren

Visch

Spijkerman

et al. 2016

IJSG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personalization, the involvement of stakeholders in the design process, is often applied in serious game design for health. It is expected to enhance the alignment of a game to the preferences and capacities of the end-user, thereby increasing the end-user’s motivation to interact with the game, which finally might enhance the aimed-for health effects of the game. However, the nature and effect of personalization have never been systematically studied, making assumptions regarding personalization ungrounded. In this literature review, we firstly provide a proposal of our Personalized Design Process-model, where personalization is defined as stakeholder involvement in the Problem Definition-, Product Design- and/or Tailoring Phase. Secondly, we conducted a systematic literature review on this model, focusing on health and its effects. In this review, 62 of the 2579 found studies were included. Analysis showed that a minority of the studies were of methodologically higher quality and some of these tested the health effect by contrasting tailored versus non-tailored games. Most studies involved stakeholders in the Tailoring Design Phase. Therefore, we conclude that involving stakeholders in the Tailoring Phase is valuable. However, to know if personalization is effective in the Product Design- and the Problem Definition Phase, more studies are needed.

show abstract

Using groupwork in the designing and playing of board games in occupational health and safety

Cited by 2 publications

References 33 publications

Pilot Project Exploring Low-tech Collaborative Board Gaming on Student Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Education

Pilot Project Exploring Low-tech Collaborative Board Gaming on Student Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Education

Personalization in Game Design for Healthcare: a Literature Review on its Definitions and Effects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About