2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12152465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Growing-Season Time Series Coherence for Improved Peatland Mapping: Comparing the Contributions of Sentinel-1 and RADARSAT-2 Coherence in Full and Partial Time Series

Abstract: Differences in topographic structure, vegetation structure, and surface wetness exist between peatland classes, making active remote sensing techniques such as SAR and LiDAR promising for peatland mapping. As the timing of green-up, senescence, and hydrologic conditions vary differently in peatland classes, and in comparison with upland classes, full growing-season time series SAR imagery was expected to produce higher accuracy classification results than using only a few select SAR images. Both interferometri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When selecting a SAR sensor for peatland mapping, considerations such as wavelength (e.g., L-band, X-band, and C-band), polarization options (with fully polarimetric sensors providing more information than dual-or single-polarisation sensors), and spatial resolution are crucial. L-band has demonstrated the ability to provide distinctive information about peatland surfaces and is relatively insensitive to vegetation variability [69]. Nonetheless, given the intricate nature of peatland ecosystems, acquiring sub-metre resolution data is imperative for accurately mapping the sporadic patterns of peatland vegetation.…”
Section: Peatland Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When selecting a SAR sensor for peatland mapping, considerations such as wavelength (e.g., L-band, X-band, and C-band), polarization options (with fully polarimetric sensors providing more information than dual-or single-polarisation sensors), and spatial resolution are crucial. L-band has demonstrated the ability to provide distinctive information about peatland surfaces and is relatively insensitive to vegetation variability [69]. Nonetheless, given the intricate nature of peatland ecosystems, acquiring sub-metre resolution data is imperative for accurately mapping the sporadic patterns of peatland vegetation.…”
Section: Peatland Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After preprocessing the Sentinel-1 images, we calculated several statistical metrics for each pixel in the time-series stack, for each polarization (VV and VH), and for both coherence and intensity. The statistical descriptors chosen largely followed earlier studies that performed similar analysis [30,31,67]. Multi-temporal, pixel-based statistical descriptors included mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, median, maximum, and minimum.…”
Section: Time-series Statistical Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, there are some recent options designed to address the underutilization of InSAR products-one of which is the European Space Agency's Geohazards Thematic Exploitation Platform (GEP), an R&D activity designed for large scale Earth observation data processing. Millard et al [67] used this platform for Sentinel-1 InSAR processing and peatland mapping, although they noted that processing options were limited in comparison to a dedicated InSAR processing software (e.g., SNAP). Piter et al [106] discuss other cloud-based platforms including CODE-DE and the Alaska Satellite Facility's OpenSARLab and present their advantages and limitations.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, that might not fully utilize or miss the time series change information. Using the long-term observation data directly can retain complete and rich wetland time information, and the results are more accurate [11,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%