“…The repeat 231 units in R1 were reverse complements to those in R2 (Figure 3B). Our DNA-seq data showed that the copy 232 numbers of R1 and R2 exhibited great diversity within an individual, which confirmed the finding from our 233 previous study of the E. fullo mitochondrial genome [5]. As repeat units in R1 and R2 were reverse 234 complements, we used PCR amplification (Table 1) combined with Sanger sequencing to further investigate 235 R1 sequences in more than 100 individual ticks from five species (D. silvarum, D. nuttalli, D. marginatus, D. 236 niveus, and D. ushakovae) and obtained the following results: (1) for each individual tick, the R1 sequence 237 obtained using Sanger sequencing is actually a consensus sequence of a large number of heterogeneous 238 sequences; (2) copy numbers were distributed between 2 and 5 for all studied repeat units, with one partial 239 repeat unit counted as 1; (3) in total, three types of repeat units of R1 with lengths of 28, 34, and 44 bp 240 (types 1, 2. and 3, respectively) were identified (Figure 3B) and noted as R28, R34 and R44; (4) in general, R1 241 sequences from ticks of one species were composed of repeat units of one type and R1 sequences from ticks 242 of the same species from different places had different copy numbers; and (5) among all studied ticks, D.…”