2016
DOI: 10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Horn’s Parallel Analysis Method in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Determining the Number of Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed and simulated eigenvalues are presented in Table 2. Observed eigenvalues that exceed simulated eigenvalues are determined to be valid [88]. The parallel analysis supports a one-factor solution.…”
Section: Perceptions Of Pblmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Observed and simulated eigenvalues are presented in Table 2. Observed eigenvalues that exceed simulated eigenvalues are determined to be valid [88]. The parallel analysis supports a one-factor solution.…”
Section: Perceptions Of Pblmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Specifically, factors with eigenvalues higher than 1.0 were retained; a visual examination of scree plots for sharp dropoffs in plotted eigenvalues were conducted; and the total percent of variance explained (e.g., the variance of the original variable vs. the variance explained by each factor) was examined (Pett, Lackey, & Sullivan, 2003). Finally, parallel analysis using the Monte Carlo simulation technique was used, which generates a random artificial dataset to compare to the original dataset to determine the number of factors (Çokluk & Koçak, 2016). Parallel analysis determines the number of factors to retain by going above and beyond simply retaining factors with eigenvalues above 1.0, which can retain an excessive number of factors; instead, it retains factors in which the eigenvalue in the simulated sample is greater than the corresponding eigenvalue in the actual data (Çokluk & Koçak, 2016;Ledesma & Valero-Mora, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, parallel analysis using the Monte Carlo simulation technique was used, which generates a random artificial dataset to compare to the original dataset to determine the number of factors (Çokluk & Koçak, 2016). Parallel analysis determines the number of factors to retain by going above and beyond simply retaining factors with eigenvalues above 1.0, which can retain an excessive number of factors; instead, it retains factors in which the eigenvalue in the simulated sample is greater than the corresponding eigenvalue in the actual data (Çokluk & Koçak, 2016;Ledesma & Valero-Mora, 2007). The EFAs and parallel analyses were carried out in IBM SPSS (version 21.0).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most factors that could be extracted are not meaningful and therefore should not be retained. The Kaiser criterion and scree plot approaches, PA (parallel analysis), and the MAP (minimum average partial) correlation procedure have been widely employed to determine how many factors should be retained . However, the Kaiser criterion and scree plot approaches do not take into account sampling error so an erroneous decision may be made.…”
Section: Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%