2009
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2009.1450460265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using human authored description logics ABoxes as concept models for natural language generation

Abstract: Papers written by researchers in medical and life sciences are a valuable source of information even for non-experts looking for knowledge related to rare diseases, but only if those non-experts can read English. If researchers create descriptors of their papers in the form of description logics (DL) ABoxes (assertion components) according to a DL ontology, then by using currently available software, computers can reason over the ABoxes to infer semantic consequences of the assertions in the descriptor. One op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other side of getting creators of knowledge resources to make computer-understandable descriptors is to develop applications in areas that directly benefit the knowledge creator, a concept termed "instant gratification" by McDowell et al (2003). One example is natural language generation, which can be used to generate accurate representations of the semantic graphs in any language that is handled by the generator (Kraines and Guo, 2009;Androutsopoulos et al 2007).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other side of getting creators of knowledge resources to make computer-understandable descriptors is to develop applications in areas that directly benefit the knowledge creator, a concept termed "instant gratification" by McDowell et al (2003). One example is natural language generation, which can be used to generate accurate representations of the semantic graphs in any language that is handled by the generator (Kraines and Guo, 2009;Androutsopoulos et al 2007).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, if computer-understandable semantic statements describing expert scientific knowledge can be provided that are highly accurate and semantically rich, we could leverage advanced inference and reasoning technologies from the fields of artificial intelligence and the Semantic Web to enable computers to provide a wide range of knowledge processing services. As one example, we suggest that it should be possible to translate semantic statements created in one natural language (such as Japanese) to another (such as English), or even from one domain of knowledge (such as chemical engineering) to another (such as macroeconomics), with essentially no loss of accuracy, simply by using a relatively straightforward mapping of content models that are expressed in terms of ontologies for different knowledge domains (Bateman, 1990;Bateman et al, 2005;Dymetman, 2002;Kruijff-Korbayova & Kruijff, 1999;Kraines & Guo, 2009).…”
Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantic statement shown in Figure 4 can be rendered in English using a simple natural language generation algorithm that we have developed for the EKOSS system as shown in Figure 5 (Kraines & Guo, 2009). We have also developed natural language generation algorithms for Japanese and Chinese.…”
Section: Semantic Statements For Scenarios and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%