The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 2 — Personality Measurement and Testing 2008
DOI: 10.4135/9781849200479.n24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Implicit Association Tests for the Assessment of Implicit Personality Self-Concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated d (an effect size measure) by subtracting the subjects' average response time to trials in the congruent block from their average in the incongruent block, and dividing this score by the standard deviation for all trials in both blocks. The d algorithm was designed to maximize internal consistency, minimize factors that affect general speed of responding, and calibrate scores by each individual's variance in response time (Schnabel, Asendorpf, & Greenwald, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated d (an effect size measure) by subtracting the subjects' average response time to trials in the congruent block from their average in the incongruent block, and dividing this score by the standard deviation for all trials in both blocks. The d algorithm was designed to maximize internal consistency, minimize factors that affect general speed of responding, and calibrate scores by each individual's variance in response time (Schnabel, Asendorpf, & Greenwald, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informally, researchers tend to assume that the concept implies some infusion of high-level cognition, insight and explicit planning, but executive control may be integrated into some more complex hierarchy of control mechanisms including those that are lower level and noncognitive (Corr, Kustubayeva, this volume). In personality research, the revival of the unconscious and implicit aspects of personality may pose a particular challenge (Schnabel, Asendorpf, & Greenwald, 2008). Integral to the executive control concept is that control may be initiated by implicit processing, and control operates through biasing implicit processes .…”
Section: Issues and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown that IAT responses can be influenced by environmental factors and can vary to some extent across repeated trials (Karpinski and Hilton 2001;Lowery, Hardin, and Sinclair 2001;Mitchell, Nosek, and Banaji 2003), the IAT has been shown to have acceptable psychometric properties in self-concept research (Schnabel et al 2007). …”
Section: Measures -Implicit Collaborative Self-conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%