2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using incremental subspace and contour template for object tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the algorithm, we choose six currently most representative and classic tracking algorithms to do the comparison. The six classic algorithms are L1 Tracker [8], IVT Tracker [14], PN Tracker [15], VTD Tracker [16], MIL Tracker [17], and Frag Tracker [18]. The average processing speeds of our method for different test videos are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the algorithm, we choose six currently most representative and classic tracking algorithms to do the comparison. The six classic algorithms are L1 Tracker [8], IVT Tracker [14], PN Tracker [15], VTD Tracker [16], MIL Tracker [17], and Frag Tracker [18]. The average processing speeds of our method for different test videos are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrinsic and extrinsic changes inevitably cause large appearance variation. Due to the nature of the tracking problem, an effective appearance model is of prime importance for the success of a tracking algorithm [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there have been a large number of research methods and theories for 2D tracking, such as morphological tracking [33,34], template-based tracking [35,36], kernelized correlation filters method [37], compressed sensing method [38,39], deep-learningbased tracking [40,41], etc. The targets involved in this article have relatively fixed geometric characteristics.…”
Section: Background Of 2d Target Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It finds the projection directions along which the reconstruction error to the original data is minimum and projects the original data into a lower dimensional space spanned by those directions corresponding to the top eigenvalues. Recent studies demonstrate that two-dimensional principal component analysis (2DPCA) could achieve performance comparable to PCA with less computational cost [9,10]. Given a series of image matrices Y = [ 1 2 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ], 2DPCA aims to obtain an orthogonal left-projection matrix U, an orthogonal right-projection matrix V, and the projection coefficients A = [ 1 2 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ] by solving the following objective function:…”
Section: Visual Object Tracking Model Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%