Fourth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2003. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/isqed.2003.1194711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using integer equations for high level formal verification property checking

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also path coverage on LTL properties can be obtained based on this word-level model efficiently unlike of other models [11,12]. As mentioned before, our approach does not need to solve integer equations or do satisfiability checking despite of other approaches [3,4,5,6,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also path coverage on LTL properties can be obtained based on this word-level model efficiently unlike of other models [11,12]. As mentioned before, our approach does not need to solve integer equations or do satisfiability checking despite of other approaches [3,4,5,6,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHIRE is a format that for every hardware description language construct has a distinct C++ object. CHIRE format is then transformed to a Data Flow Graph (DFG) [11] format and subsequently to BDD [12] representation.…”
Section: Lemma 1 Given An Hdl Model Of a Design + With A Set Of Assigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also path coverage on LTL properties can be obtained based on this word-level model efficiently unlike of other models [11,12]. As mentioned before, our approach does not need to solve integer equations or do satisfiability checking despite of other approaches [3,4,5,6,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this work, we used VHDL to describe a design and a sequence format to describe its properties. We extract Data Flow Graph (DFG) for the design [9], convert it to LTED, and prove the design property symbolically [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%