2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40595-016-0086-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using internal evaluation measures to validate the quality of diverse stream clustering algorithms

Abstract: Measuring the quality of a clustering algorithm has shown to be as important as the algorithm itself. It is a crucial part of choosing the clustering algorithm that performs best for an input data. Streaming input data have many features that make them much more challenging than static ones. They are endless, varying and emerging with high speeds. This raised new challenges for the clustering algorithms as well as for their evaluation measures. Up till now, external evaluation measures were exclusively used fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of different types and number of features may impact the clustering algorithm, modifying its resulting cluster formation. To assess which CBRA strategy achieves the best internal measure, we calculate the Xie‐Bien (XB) cluster index I XB , which obtains the ratio of cluster compactness by cluster separation, given by IXB=iboldxboldCid2false(boldx,boldcifalse)n·minijd2false(boldci,boldcjfalse). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of different types and number of features may impact the clustering algorithm, modifying its resulting cluster formation. To assess which CBRA strategy achieves the best internal measure, we calculate the Xie‐Bien (XB) cluster index I XB , which obtains the ratio of cluster compactness by cluster separation, given by IXB=iboldxboldCid2false(boldx,boldcifalse)n·minijd2false(boldci,boldcjfalse). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a stream data environment, it is impractical to use an extrinsic evaluation method because it is nearly impossible to provide the ground truth. Thus, using an intrinsic evaluation method is the only realistic and efficient way to evaluate the clustering quality [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of internal validation is to examine the compactness/cohesion and the separation of the clusters [ 43 ]. There are various internal validation measures and they are variations of these two.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%