2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41324-019-00289-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Kappa methodology to consider volunteered geographic information in official land administration systems in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of VGI hinders its utilization for official purposes such as in land administration. To minimize the ground-truthing of VGI to assess its quality, a Kappa methodology-based solution has been proposed in [38] by offering a proxy quality of VGI through agreement of consensus. Similarly, other proxy measures of VGI quality using trust and reputation modeling have been proposed by [39].…”
Section: Sdi and Vgimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of VGI hinders its utilization for official purposes such as in land administration. To minimize the ground-truthing of VGI to assess its quality, a Kappa methodology-based solution has been proposed in [38] by offering a proxy quality of VGI through agreement of consensus. Similarly, other proxy measures of VGI quality using trust and reputation modeling have been proposed by [39].…”
Section: Sdi and Vgimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach to solving this could be comparing VGI and data from other sources, such as public registers. However, it may be problematic to deal with contradictions between public records and VGI as both sources may be incorrect [7], [17], [18], [21], [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative measures are concerned with the ability of a product to satisfy implied and stated needs (ISO, 2013). These include completeness, consistency, positional accuracy (Jacobs, Satkin, Roman, Speyer, & Pless, 2007), thematic accuracy (Moreri, 2020), and temporal accuracy (Girres & Touya, 2010). In contrast, qualitative quality indicators are mainly used to express the quality overview of the data and these include purpose, usage (Mendoza, Poblete, & Castillo, 2010), and lineage (Van Oort & Bregt, 2005).…”
Section: Quality Assurance In Crowdsourcing Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%