2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-012-0617-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using kernels for a video-based mouse-replacement interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Invasive BCIs range from 5.4–69 bits/min (Brunner, Ritaccio, Emrich, Bischof, & Schalk, 2011; Guenther & Brumberg, 2011; Hill et al, 2006; Simeral, Kim, Black, Donoghue, & Hochberg, 2011), whereas non-invasive BCIs can range from 1.8–24 bits/min (Nijboer et al, 2008; Sellers, Krusienski, McFarland, Vaughan, & Wolpaw, 2006; Wolpaw et al, 2002). Eye tracking can produce ITRs in the range of 60–222 bits/min (Frey et al, 1990; Higginbotham et al, 2007; Liu et al, 2012; Majaranta et al, 2006, MacKenzie, Aula, & Räihä, 2006), and ITRs produced with head tracking devices range from 78–174 bits/min (Epstein, Missimer, & Betke, 2014; Williams & Kirsch, 2008). Mechanical switches can produce ITRs in the range of 96–198 bits/min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive BCIs range from 5.4–69 bits/min (Brunner, Ritaccio, Emrich, Bischof, & Schalk, 2011; Guenther & Brumberg, 2011; Hill et al, 2006; Simeral, Kim, Black, Donoghue, & Hochberg, 2011), whereas non-invasive BCIs can range from 1.8–24 bits/min (Nijboer et al, 2008; Sellers, Krusienski, McFarland, Vaughan, & Wolpaw, 2006; Wolpaw et al, 2002). Eye tracking can produce ITRs in the range of 60–222 bits/min (Frey et al, 1990; Higginbotham et al, 2007; Liu et al, 2012; Majaranta et al, 2006, MacKenzie, Aula, & Räihä, 2006), and ITRs produced with head tracking devices range from 78–174 bits/min (Epstein, Missimer, & Betke, 2014; Williams & Kirsch, 2008). Mechanical switches can produce ITRs in the range of 96–198 bits/min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the tracking method is also vulnerable to colour and illumination environment, and requires initialization step. In [19], the authors alleviated the "feature drift" and illuminationdependent problems of [15]. However, that system is not very robust yet, especially when the motion of the user is fast.…”
Section: ) Motion Tracking Based Atsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These ATs track motions of body parts, such as eye [13], [14] / tongue [1], [8] / head [15], [16] / face [17], [18], [19] trackers. In [13], [14], eye gaze was directly used to select the target.…”
Section: ) Motion Tracking Based Atsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will test other mouse-replacement systems as well, for example, the beta version of the Camera Mouse, called "Camera Mouse Suite'' [4], which is available for free download on the internet and includes the Camera Mouse team's most recent work: (1) an optical-flow-based version of the Camera Mouse [1] (2) a version that uses kernels as the tracking mechanism [5], (3) an interface that interprets eyebrow raises for input of scanbased text-entry systems [9] and (4) an interface that provides full pointer control via blink and wink detection [11].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%