2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using large benthic macrofauna to refine and improve ecological indicators of bottom trawling disturbance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to model 3 community indicators: density, biomass, and functional richness, chosen based on their sensitivity to trawling disturbance in Danish waters (McLaverty et al 2020). Density and biomass were calculated as the total number and biomass of individuals in a sample, respectively.…”
Section: Univariate Analysis: Community Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to model 3 community indicators: density, biomass, and functional richness, chosen based on their sensitivity to trawling disturbance in Danish waters (McLaverty et al 2020). Density and biomass were calculated as the total number and biomass of individuals in a sample, respectively.…”
Section: Univariate Analysis: Community Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McLaverty et al [55] drew attention to the interest of using large (>4 mm) instead of small (1-4 mm) macrofauna to detect bottom trawling. Indeed, they found that stronger relationships exist between trawling intensity and large rather than small macrofauna response, and they argued that small macrofauna are typically characterized by high density, diversity, and population growth rates, and their relative resilience to trawling may mask the response of the more sensitive macrofauna [55]. This is probably also the case in the work of Dannheim [31], who failed to highlight the consequences of trawling on infauna communities.…”
Section: Performance Of the Indices And Ecological Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TDI did not perform well, but only a few observations could be taken into account as a consequence of the poor match between the dataset and the functional trait table [16]. Further, this can also be related to the masking effect of resilient and high-density species ( [55] see below). Here, the decrease in species richness is so important [35] that all indices that take it or the loss of species into account (GPBI, M-AMBI) can detect the hypoxia events compared to those that do not (TDI).…”
Section: Performance Of the Indices And Ecological Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling efficiency differs when catching various components of the communities, including for the catching of animals from different size groups. (McLaverty et al 2020) and gears that sample bigger animals will catch a more significant fraction of long-lived fauna. The integration of other sampling gears will capture other components of the benthic community and likely strengthen the overall assessment.…”
Section: Management Scenarios and Seafloor Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%