Using learning styles as a basis for creating adaptive open learning environments: an evaluation

Adaptive e-learning systems through learning styles: A review of the literature

“…Research reveals that Adaptive E-learning Systems based on Learning Styles are more efficient and reduce the learning time, increase the completion level of a subject, and improve academic performance (Graf et al, 2009). New methods have been developed to provide a more reliable and performant personalized learning process to the learners (Fasihuddin et al, 2016). So, such systems have been developed that the most significant of them are the following:…”

“…According to the conducted literature review, the main reason behind the preferences of most researchers for the Felder Silverman model concerning the rest lies mainly in the fact that a questionnaire has been developed that is very effective and easy to use for adaptive (Abech et al, 2016), (Ali et al, 2019), (Almeida et al, 2019), (Alsobhi & Alyoubi, 2019), (Anantharaman et al, 2019), (Andaloussi et al, 2019), (Apoki et al, 2020), (Araújo et al, 2020), (Arsovic & Stefanovic, 2020a), (Alshammari et al, 2015), (Alshammari & Qtaish, 2019), , (Boussakuk, 2020), (Budiyanto et al, 2017), (Christudas et al, 2018), (Dwivedi et al, 2018), (El Guabassi et al, 2018), (Elkot, 2019), (Fasihuddin et al, 2016), (Hurtado et al, 2018), (Karagiannis & Satratzemi, 2020), (Kolekar et al, 2018), (Kolekar et al, 2019), (Kurilovas, 2019), (Lakkah et al, 2017), , (Sunil & Doja, 2019), (Supangat & Bin Saringat, 2020), (Sweta & Lal, 2017), (Tarus et al, 2017), (Tortorella & Graf, 2017), (Vaidya & Joshi, 2018) VARK 4 (10%) (Aeiad & Meziane, 2019), (Bradáč & Smolka, 2020), (Hassan & Qureshi, 2018), (Nalintippayawong et al, 2017) Honey and Mumford 3 (7%) (Baharudin et al, 2017), (Drissi & Amirat, 2016),…”

“…However, apart from the prediction techniques selected, these studies do not share much in their approaches. (Abech et al, 2016), (Ali et al, 2019), (Aljojo et al, 2016), (Almeida et al, 2019), (Alsobhi & Alyoubi, 2019), (Apoki et al, 2020), (Araújo et al, 2020), (Arsovic & Stefanovic, 2020a), (Alshammari & Qtaish, 2019), (Baharudin et al, 2017), , (Boussakuk, 2020), (Bradáč & Smolka, 2020), (Budiyanto et al, 2017), (Dwivedi et al, 2018), (Drissi & Amirat, 2016), (El Guabassi et al, 2018), (Elkot, 2019), (Fasihuddin et al, 2016), (Hafidi & Bensebaa, 2015), (Hassan & Qureshi, 2018), (Hurtado et al, 2018), (Lakkah et al, 2017), (Nalintippayawong et al, 2017), (Papanikolaou, 2015), , (Siddique et al, 2019), (Supangat & Bin Saringat, 2020), (Tarus et al, 2017), (Tortorella & Graf, 2017), (Vaidya & Joshi, 2018) Implicit or automatic modeling (Dynamic) (Sunil & Doja, 2019), (Kolekar et al, 2019) It becomes pretty clear that there is a need to move into implicit techniques, providing greater flexibility and allowing the learner to change and evolve along with her skills. However, even the studies that have been made that way have differing outlooks on how this automation should be achieved, resulting in multiple approaches with no standard anchors.…”

“…Two (2) studies combined Learning Styles, prior knowledge, learning goals, cognitive style, and two (2) other studies combined Learning style, Prior Knowledge, Learner's Device Information, Behavioural data. Lastly, the following combination was only adopted by one (1) paper each, a) Learning style, Learning style only 3 (Alshammari et al, 2015), (Kolekar et al, 2018), (Vaidya & Joshi, 2018) Learning style & Prior Knowledge 14 (Ali et al, 2019), (Alshammari & Qtaish, 2019), (Anantharaman et al, 2019), (Arsovic & Stefanovic, 2020a), , (Bradáč & Smolka, 2020), (Budiyanto et al, 2017), (Drissi & Amirat, 2016), (Karagiannis & Satratzemi, 2020), (Lakkah et al, 2017), , (Supangat & Bin Saringat, 2020), (Sunil & Doja, 2019), (Tarus et al, 2017) Learning style & Behavioral data 7 (Elkot, 2019), (Fasihuddin et al, 2016), (Hurtado et al, 2018), (Kolekar et al, 2019), (Kurilovas, 2019), (Nalintippayawong et al, 2017), (Sweta & Lal, 2017) Learning style, Prior Knowledge & Behavioral data 5 (Andaloussi et al, 2019), (Baharudin et al, 2017), (Christudas et al, 2018), (Hafidi & Bensebaa, 2015), (Papanikolaou, 2015) Learning style, Prior Knowledge & Learning goals 4 (Aljojo et al, 2016), (Apoki et al, 2020), (Boussakuk, 2020), (Dwivedi et From a total of fifteen (15) studies that utilized Behavioral data, seven (7) combined it with learning style only. At the same time, the rest used prior knowledge and/or learner's device information.…”

A Semiautomatic and Probabilistic Approach for Student Modeling in Ubiquitous Learning Environments

“…Therefore, the use of a self-report instrument may be used to adjust the model for better results. [Fasihuddin et al 2016] developed a prototype system that includes an adaptation mechanism of LOs based on LS, according to the FSLSM. In their pilot study, results showed that content adaptation based on LS can decrease both time spent in learning and number of accessed LOs.…”