2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using LiDAR data to locate a Middle Woodland enclosure and associated mounds, Louisa County, Iowa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previously recorded council circles, the circular feature and extraction pits recorded in our survey have little in the way of topographic expression, and the center of the feature is elevated only a small amount above the surrounding fields, as revealed in a high-resolution DSM generated from visible light imagery (Figure 7d). However, other recent studies of known mounds and enclosures in the Midwest show that modern agriculture and pasture activities can obscure or remove all topographic expression of such features, even while traces of their existence are extant below ground and in geophysical data (Henry et al 2019; Riley and Tiffany 2014): a similar process could have affected the feature we observe in our data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Unlike previously recorded council circles, the circular feature and extraction pits recorded in our survey have little in the way of topographic expression, and the center of the feature is elevated only a small amount above the surrounding fields, as revealed in a high-resolution DSM generated from visible light imagery (Figure 7d). However, other recent studies of known mounds and enclosures in the Midwest show that modern agriculture and pasture activities can obscure or remove all topographic expression of such features, even while traces of their existence are extant below ground and in geophysical data (Henry et al 2019; Riley and Tiffany 2014): a similar process could have affected the feature we observe in our data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In contrast to the extensive literature on DEM interpolation, interpolation of archaeologyspecific DFM has until recently been briefly considered in only a handful of studies with conflicting results: TLI [58], Kriging [35,59], spline interpolator [60], and nearest neighbor [61] were all declared as the most suitable interpolator. A recent study was therefore dedicated to finding the most suitable interpolator for archaeology-specific processing of airborne LiDAR data.…”
Section: Dfm Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetometry survey located traces of a plowed-down octagonal enclosure at the McKinney site (13LA1), adjacent to the Havana Hopewell Toolesboro Mounds (13LA29) in southeast Iowa (De Vore 2015). The embankment walls had been more than 2 m high, but they were flattened by farming and are now invisible from the air and barely discernible using lidar (Newhall 1841; Riley and Tiffany 2014). The embankment apparently lacked the distinctive ditches that facilitate detection of other plowed earthworks.…”
Section: Detecting Leveled Moundsmentioning
confidence: 99%