2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using local ecological knowledge to determine status and threats of the Critically Endangered Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) in Hainan, China

Abstract: The use of robust ecological data to make evidence-based management decisions for highly threatened species is often limited by data availability, and local ecological knowledge (LEK) is increasingly seen as an important source of information for conservation. Pangolins are now the most heavily trafficked mammals in illegal wildlife trade, and Chinese pangolins (Manis pentadactyla) are Critically Endangered, with no recent baseline data available to assess status of pangolin populations in China. We conducted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
95
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding the scale and type of use of wildlife products, the drivers of commercial trade and what motivates people to hunt illegally, is crucial for developing effective interventions (TRAFFIC 2008, Duffy and St John 2013, Nash et al 2016). In the case of pangolins, the drivers of trade at a global scale are relatively well known (Heinrich et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding the scale and type of use of wildlife products, the drivers of commercial trade and what motivates people to hunt illegally, is crucial for developing effective interventions (TRAFFIC 2008, Duffy and St John 2013, Nash et al 2016). In the case of pangolins, the drivers of trade at a global scale are relatively well known (Heinrich et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohapatra et al 2015, Nijman 2015, Cheng et al 2017, Gomez et al 2016 or questionnaires seeking local perceptions of hunting or trade activities (e.g. Katuwal et al 2015, Nash et al 2016 rather than asking hunters directly about their own activities and beliefs. In Asia, exceptions are: Nash et al (2016) who assessed local ecological knowledge across seven protected areas in Hainan, China; Zhang et al (2017) who gathered data from 38 informants in the northwest of Kachin State, Myanmar; Mahmood et al (2017) who interviewed an unreported number of local people in Pakistan; and Pantel and Anak (2010) who interviewed 13 individuals in Sabah, Malaysia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also evaluate the reliability of local knowledge as a tool to assess the status and trends of multiple wildlife species over space and time. Although numerous studies have already proved the robustness of traditional ecological knowledge as a tool for management (Gandiwa, 2012;Pan et al, 2015;Nash et al, 2016;Brittain et al, 2018), our study contributes to improving the current knowledge on the state and trends in wildlife composition by integrating the spatial and temporal scales, although a similar study has been conducted in D. R. Congo (van Vliet et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The importance of using evidence-based conservation to inform effective management decisions is increasingly recognized by conservation researchers and practitioners (Sutherland et al 2004;Segan et al 2010;Nash et al 2016). The use of genetics to inform evidence-based management decisions for highly threatened species can improve conservation outcomes (Allendorf et al 2010;Corlett 2016;Pierson et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%