2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Local States To Drive the Sampling of Global Conformations in Proteins

Abstract: Conformational changes associated with protein function often occur beyond the time scale currently accessible to unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, so that different approaches have been developed to accelerate their sampling. Here we investigate how the knowledge of backbone conformations preferentially adopted by protein fragments, as contained in precalculated libraries known as structural alphabets (SA), can be used to explore the landscape of protein conformations in MD simulations. We find th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For every simulation, we have used GSATools (Pandini et al, 2013) to encode the conformation of each frame into a SA string, composed of 117 letters for our 120-residue protein. We then transformed the SA representation to that of a reduced structural alphabet (rSA), according to the mapping defined between these two alphabets (Pandini and Fornili, 2016). The rSA is a reduced representation of the original alphabet in which each letter corresponds to a macro-region of the density space.…”
Section: Structural Alphabetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For every simulation, we have used GSATools (Pandini et al, 2013) to encode the conformation of each frame into a SA string, composed of 117 letters for our 120-residue protein. We then transformed the SA representation to that of a reduced structural alphabet (rSA), according to the mapping defined between these two alphabets (Pandini and Fornili, 2016). The rSA is a reduced representation of the original alphabet in which each letter corresponds to a macro-region of the density space.…”
Section: Structural Alphabetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SA approach is therefore particularly adapted to compare and characterize of structural variability [ 31 ] and to characterize and predict protein flexibility [ 32 ]. A tool based on a SA of 28 SLs, called “GSATools” was developed to analyze an ensemble of molecular dynamics models associated with the same sequence [ 23 ] and combined to molecular simulation to increase the exploration of the conformational space of proteins [ 33 ]. Based on another SA of 16 SLs, Mahajan et al (2014) compared the local conformation variations observed at structurally equivalent positions of a multiple structural alignment obtained using NMR models and different homologous structures of a single protein [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in 63 . Furthermore, our method could be combined with others enhancing the sampling of orthogonal degrees of freedom, such as global protein motions 60,81 , rotations around torsional angles 61,62 , secondary structure changes 82,83 , rescaled protein-ligand interactions 54,63 , just to cite a few options. In addition, experimental information from many sources could be easily encoded in new CVs and/or restraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%