2022
DOI: 10.1785/0220210197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using LSTM Neural Networks for Onsite Earthquake Early Warning

Abstract: Onsite earthquake early warning (EEW) systems determine possible destructive S waves solely from initial P waves and issue alarms before heavy shaking begins. Onsite EEW plays a crucial role in filling in the blank of the blind zone near the epicenter, which often suffers the most from disastrous ground shaking. Previous studies suggest that the peak P-wave displacement amplitude (Pd) may serve as a possible indicator of destructive earthquakes. However, the attempt to use a single indicator with fixed thresho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Onsite prediction of the final ground-motion intensity at a target site using the first few seconds of its observations is a major topic of EEW (Nakamura 1988;Wu and Kanamori 2005;Spallarossa et al 2018). Recently, this has been approached using ML techniques, such as random forest (Hu et al 2023), CNN (Jozinović et al 2020;Zhang et al 2022b), support vector machine , Graph Neural Network (Bloemheuvel et al 2022), and LSTM (Wang et al 2022b(Wang et al , 2023a. Additionally, ML has been applied to discriminate in real-time whether a signal stems from an actual earthquake based on the initial part of ground motions (Li et al 2018;Meier et al 2019;Liu et al 2022).…”
Section: Prediction Of Ground-motion Intensity From Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Onsite prediction of the final ground-motion intensity at a target site using the first few seconds of its observations is a major topic of EEW (Nakamura 1988;Wu and Kanamori 2005;Spallarossa et al 2018). Recently, this has been approached using ML techniques, such as random forest (Hu et al 2023), CNN (Jozinović et al 2020;Zhang et al 2022b), support vector machine , Graph Neural Network (Bloemheuvel et al 2022), and LSTM (Wang et al 2022b(Wang et al , 2023a. Additionally, ML has been applied to discriminate in real-time whether a signal stems from an actual earthquake based on the initial part of ground motions (Li et al 2018;Meier et al 2019;Liu et al 2022).…”
Section: Prediction Of Ground-motion Intensity From Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be more precise, it takes information from a sensor at a location to detect earthquakes and generate alerts at the same location using a single sensor, with all algorithm processing taking place at that station (Allen and Melgar, 2019;Bindi et al, 2015;Picozzi et al, 2015). In general, on-site EEWS serves a significant role in bridging the gap of the blind zone, which frequently experiences the worst ground shaking and where an EEWS cannot issue an alarm close to the epicentre (Chen et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2022). The basic form of an on-site EEWS can be a ground motion threshold-based method that sounds an alarm or warning as soon as unusual or harmful ground motion is discovered.…”
Section: Classification Of the Earthquake Early Warning Systems Based...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it may meet the limitations in terms of source rupture area. Recently, the machine learning (ML) approach is evolved and is widely used for the EEW (Allen and Melgar 2019;Wang et al 2022). The ML approach has the potential to overcome the limitation of the current EEW approaches.…”
Section: Summary and Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%