2020
DOI: 10.1002/minf.202000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Machine Learning Methods and Structural Alerts for Prediction of Mitochondrial Toxicity

Abstract: Over the last few years more and more organ and idiosyncratic toxicities were linked to mitochondrial toxicity. Despite well-established assays, such as the seahorse and Glucose/Galactose assay, an in silico approach to mitochondrial toxicity is still feasible, particularly when it comes to the assessment of large compound libraries. Therefore, in silico approaches could be very beneficial to indicate hazards early in the drug development pipeline. By combining multiple endpoints, we derived the largest so far… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this study was to predict mitochondrial toxicity of chemicals. Other researchers (Hemmerich, Troger, Füzi, Ecker, & G., 2020; Tang, Chen, & Hong, 2020) collected compounds that were inactive in mitochondrial membrane potential assay as negative chemicals. However, in this study, considering that mitochondrial functions include ATP production, ROS generation, material metabolism, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and so forth, so single indicator that shows negative cannot be used to determine that the compound will not affect mitochondrial function (Massart, Borgne‐Sanchez, & Fromenty, 2018; Wills, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study was to predict mitochondrial toxicity of chemicals. Other researchers (Hemmerich, Troger, Füzi, Ecker, & G., 2020; Tang, Chen, & Hong, 2020) collected compounds that were inactive in mitochondrial membrane potential assay as negative chemicals. However, in this study, considering that mitochondrial functions include ATP production, ROS generation, material metabolism, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and so forth, so single indicator that shows negative cannot be used to determine that the compound will not affect mitochondrial function (Massart, Borgne‐Sanchez, & Fromenty, 2018; Wills, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important area here was the extrapolation of NAM concentrations to in vivo doses (IVIVE, PBPK) (Fisher et al 2019;Simeon et al 2020;Toma et al 2018). Additionally, novel QSAR tools and machine learning approaches were put in place to assess chemical similarity among test compounds (Gadaleta et al 2018a, b;Hemmerich et al 2020;Luechtefeld et al 2018;Toropova et al 2018;Toropov and Toropova 2017;Troger et al 2020) and to predict toxicological properties from their structure.…”
Section: The Repository Of Nams Available For Nam-enhanced Raxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell death mechanism presumably involves mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, independently of mPTPM. In this sense, a recent chemoinformatic study shows that molecules causing mitochondrial toxicity can be characterized by having relatively restricted values of physicochemical properties such as log P , molecular weight, and surface area [52] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%