2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4035-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using machine learning to parse breast pathology reports

Abstract: Our learning curve analysis shows that the model can achieve reasonable results even when trained on a few annotations. We developed a user-friendly interface to the database that allows physicians to easily identify patients with target characteristics and export the matching cohort. This model has the potential to reduce the effort required for analyzing large amounts of data from medical records, and to minimize the cost and time required to glean scientific insight from these data.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, most of the patients experienced grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic adverse events, and no severe event was reported. The toxicological profiles and findings in our results were tolerable and similar to those reported previously [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, most of the patients experienced grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic adverse events, and no severe event was reported. The toxicological profiles and findings in our results were tolerable and similar to those reported previously [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 22 patients (52%), consistent with previous reports [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Although the incidence of neutropenia in the combination therapy was higher than in capecitabine or vinorelbine monotherapy [34,37], the incidence of febrile neutropenia was considerably low, ranging from 0 to 11% [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], and it would not be associated with infective complications. The compliance with the protocol observed in our trial was favorable, due to the reasonable dose intensity and moderate toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…0.6 mm in diameter) [52] TISSUE BANK: identifiers about location of tissue samples within an institution [52] STATUS: whether confirmed, suspected and there is no evidence of finding (e.g. probable, definite, without) [42], [57] RECURRENT STATUS: the value of recurrent status [42], [63], [57] TEMPORAL INFORMATION: refers to information about time (e.g., year, month, and date, 2007-08-04) [42], [57] SPECIMEN TYPE: the type of specimen involved in diagnosis [53] LATERALITY: describes the side of a paired organ associated with origin of the primary cancer [53], [54], [25], [48], [64], [27], [51] TUMOR SIZE: how large across the tumor is at its widest point (part of cancer staging) [52], [53], [54], [25], [48], [65], [59], [60], [62], [57] TNM STAGE: cancer staging system, can be a separate frame with further information (TNM CLASSIFICATION) [55], [53], [2], [3], [25], [66], [67], [60], [50], [40], [61] EXTENSION: direct extension of tumor [53] UNCERTAINTY: used to differentiate clinical suspicions from conclusive findings (e.g., possible, likely) [68],…”
Section: Framementioning
confidence: 99%