2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using machine learning to predict anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation: A UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common reason for exclusion on the second screen was that the article did not evaluate human subjects (37.8%), followed by not including medication use (37.1%). Of these, a total of 22 articles were selected to be discussed in our review 11–32 . Of the included studies, data were primarily derived from an academic hospital (43.5%), were located within the United States (43.5%), were retrospective cohort studies (91.3%), and were published in 2020 or later (65.2%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most common reason for exclusion on the second screen was that the article did not evaluate human subjects (37.8%), followed by not including medication use (37.1%). Of these, a total of 22 articles were selected to be discussed in our review 11–32 . Of the included studies, data were primarily derived from an academic hospital (43.5%), were located within the United States (43.5%), were retrospective cohort studies (91.3%), and were published in 2020 or later (65.2%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study performed external validation using data from the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium. A different study evaluated predictors for time at goal, finding depression to be a consistent predictor for inadequate control 30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretically, ML algorithms could be applied to develop predictive models to optimize warfarin dosing, using either regression or multi classification models. Nine studies were included [96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104] . Most of them derive from a multiethnic International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) dataset 105 using several ML regression models (Supplementary Table 5).…”
Section: Prediction Of a Personalized Anticoagulant Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these limitations can be overcome by incorporation of machine/deep learning methods to infer prothrombotic biomarkers using image-based biophysical models to accelerate aspects of patient-specific functional assessment (Figure 7) (9,(104)(105)(106)(107)(108)(109)(110)(111)(112). An example of this approach is the advent of physics informed neural networks (PINNs) which integrate the PDEs discussed in Section 3.2 as part of the loss function to enable more correct approximations of the solution than earlier forms of machine learning, even with limited data availability (104,(113)(114)(115).…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%