1999
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Maximum Likelihood to Estimate Population Size From Temporal Changes in Allele Frequencies

Abstract: We develop a maximum-likelihood framework for using temporal changes in allele frequencies to estimate the number of breeding individuals in a population. We use simulations to compare the performance of this estimator to an F-statistic estimator of variance effective population size. The maximum-likelihood estimator had a lower variance and smaller bias. Taking advantage of the likelihood framework, we extend the model to include exponential growth and show that temporal allele frequency data from three or mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the deviation of the LRS distribution from the χ 2 distribution, the most likely population size under the null hypothesis, Ň , systematically overestimates the true population size, N , especially when the number of data points is small (see Tables 1 and S1). This phenomenon is consistent with previous reports (WAPLES, 1989;WILLIAMSON and SLATKIN, 1999;WANG, 2001). The bias in the inferred population size decreases with increasing number of data points, almost independently of the true population size or the observation time (see Figure S2).…”
Section: Likelihood Of Time-series Data and The Likelihood Ratio Stat...supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the deviation of the LRS distribution from the χ 2 distribution, the most likely population size under the null hypothesis, Ň , systematically overestimates the true population size, N , especially when the number of data points is small (see Tables 1 and S1). This phenomenon is consistent with previous reports (WAPLES, 1989;WILLIAMSON and SLATKIN, 1999;WANG, 2001). The bias in the inferred population size decreases with increasing number of data points, almost independently of the true population size or the observation time (see Figure S2).…”
Section: Likelihood Of Time-series Data and The Likelihood Ratio Stat...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is a well-developed literature on inferring population sizes from genetic time-series data assuming neutrality (POL-LAK, 1983;WAPLES, 1989;WILLIAMSON and SLATKIN, 1999;WANG, 2001) and a rapidly growing literature on inferring natural selection from such time series (BOLLBACK et al, 2008;ILLINGWORTH and MUSTONEN, 2011;ILLINGWORTH et al, 2012;MALASPINAS et al, 2012;MATHIESON and MCVEAN, 2013). However, even the simplest case -the dynamics of two alternative alleles at a single genetic locus independent of all other loci -presents a number of statistical challenges that have not been resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to estimating local density is to measure the rate of genetic drift in an area. To do this, one compares allele frequencies in at least two samples collected in a region in different generations, either at different points in time, or, in a species with overlapping generations, between contemporaneous individuals of different life stages, e.g., saplings and mature trees (Williamson & Slatkin, 1999). The rate of drift is governed by, and therefore provides an estimate of, local population size; this is analogous to the variance effective size of a population (Ewens, 2004, Charlesworth, 2009, Wang et al, 2016.…”
Section: Population Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For short evolutionary timescales, a discrete-time Wright-Fisher model of random mating is often used to describe the dynamics of the population allele frequency in the underlying HMM. This approach has been used to estimate the effective population size from temporal allele frequency variation, assuming a neutral model of evolution [Williamson and Slatkin (1999)]. More recently, temporal and spatial variations of advantageous alleles have been investigated through an HMM framework that can incorporate migration between multiple subpopulations [Mathieson and McVean (2013)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%