1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.1994.tb00006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Mediation to Resolve Personnel Disputes in a State Bureaucracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results in terms of disposals and satisfaction rates in REDRESS are positive, with evidence too of significant 'upstream' effects in terms of conflict prevention. 1 Findings from other studies of individual organisations, again from the public sector, are also generally positive (deLeon 1994;Hébert 1999;Wood and Leon 2006), as are those from surveys of organisations Seeber 1998, 2001;AAA 2003;while Varma and Stallworth 2001 is an exception). The limited British evidence to date similarly finds encouraging outcomes both in surveys (CIPD 2008;Johnston 2008) and, inter alia, the Acas/CIPD case study series (Latreille 2011).…”
Section: Existing Evidence and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Results in terms of disposals and satisfaction rates in REDRESS are positive, with evidence too of significant 'upstream' effects in terms of conflict prevention. 1 Findings from other studies of individual organisations, again from the public sector, are also generally positive (deLeon 1994;Hébert 1999;Wood and Leon 2006), as are those from surveys of organisations Seeber 1998, 2001;AAA 2003;while Varma and Stallworth 2001 is an exception). The limited British evidence to date similarly finds encouraging outcomes both in surveys (CIPD 2008;Johnston 2008) and, inter alia, the Acas/CIPD case study series (Latreille 2011).…”
Section: Existing Evidence and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 79%