2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-022-10091-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using metaheuristic algorithms to optimize a mixed model-based ground-motion prediction model and associated variance components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third possible solution is using machine learning in predicting site parameters and local site effect. For instance, Ji et al (2021) and Zhu et al (2022) used parameters obtained from HVSR to predict earthquake site response for stations in Japan, and Akhani and Pezeshk (2022) reduced the uncertainties in GMMs by optimizing the regression coefficients. Also, Tamhidi et al (2022) proposed a new approach in predicting ground motion IMs at a target location (uninstrumented sites), which would allow estimating the site-specific HVSR-based proxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third possible solution is using machine learning in predicting site parameters and local site effect. For instance, Ji et al (2021) and Zhu et al (2022) used parameters obtained from HVSR to predict earthquake site response for stations in Japan, and Akhani and Pezeshk (2022) reduced the uncertainties in GMMs by optimizing the regression coefficients. Also, Tamhidi et al (2022) proposed a new approach in predicting ground motion IMs at a target location (uninstrumented sites), which would allow estimating the site-specific HVSR-based proxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the recent development in data-driven models like machine learning models has attracted the attention of researchers to apply these advanced tools for various problems related to different engineering areas (Worden et al, 2007;Akhani et al, 2019;Sparks et al, 2020;Lange and Sippel, 2020;Zounemat et al, 2021;Gandomi et al2021;Kashani et al, 2021;Akhani and Pezeshk, 2022;Azari et al, 2022;Ali et al, 2022). Machine learning models were adopted broadly for studying the scour around hydraulic structures because traditional methods like numerical or experimental models require a lot of data, and these models are costly.…”
Section: Figure 1 An Illustration Showing Scouring Around a Bridge Piermentioning
confidence: 99%