1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02694505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using meteorologic data to predict daily ragweed pollen levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies used meteorological data to predict not the seasonal quantities but the daily ragweed pollen concentrations (Raynor and Hayes 1970;Comtois and Sherknies 1992). Stark et al (1997) succeeded in predicting the ragweed pollen levels 1 day in advance, using a Poisson regression. Such predictions should also be interesting in the future and could complete our information for allergic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies used meteorological data to predict not the seasonal quantities but the daily ragweed pollen concentrations (Raynor and Hayes 1970;Comtois and Sherknies 1992). Stark et al (1997) succeeded in predicting the ragweed pollen levels 1 day in advance, using a Poisson regression. Such predictions should also be interesting in the future and could complete our information for allergic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When nights are not hot enough as to favour anther dehiscence (i.e. >10-15°C) in mid-autumn, the pollen curve tails off in Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Bianchi 1959 ;Stark et al 1997 ) , although there may not have been any night frost. The effect of heating and of related meteorological variables can alter as the season progresses, especially as a result of changes in the amounts of remaining pollen to be dispersed or of pollen production (Smith and Emberlin 2005 ;Vázquez et al 2003 ) .…”
Section: Duration Of the Pollen Season And The Shape Of The Pollen Curvementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on the work of different authors, Díaz de la Guardia et al [6]; Galán et al [7]; Sabariego et al [8]; Tortajada and Mateu [9], factors as temperature, humidity, and hours of sun and wind speed were incorporated in the model. This methodology explains approximately 75-80% of the variability in the airborne Cupressaceae pollen concentration.…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%