2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using miniaturised scanning mobility particle sizers to observe size distribution patterns of quasi-ultrafine aerosols inhaled during city commuting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements in Lak Si were recorded with an instrument which can detect smaller particles (down to 4.5 nm compared to the TSI CPC at 10 nm). However, the peak size concentration in this experiment was expected to be between 30 and 70 nm [ 57 ]. Even with a relative undercount, the TSI measurements on the transport route are higher than the fixed measurement, indicating the importance of proximity to the source.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The measurements in Lak Si were recorded with an instrument which can detect smaller particles (down to 4.5 nm compared to the TSI CPC at 10 nm). However, the peak size concentration in this experiment was expected to be between 30 and 70 nm [ 57 ]. Even with a relative undercount, the TSI measurements on the transport route are higher than the fixed measurement, indicating the importance of proximity to the source.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies use PM 10 or PM 2.5 mass measurements to assess pollutant exposure, as submicron and ultrafine particles are costlier and more difficult to measure. However, the number of particles measured is predominantly found in the submicron range [ 57 ]. Using miniaturised scanning mobility particle sizers, Moreno et al [ 57 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Minimum scanning time for SMPS is 1 minute, as overly fast scans can distort particle size distribution. Another reason for slower scans is low counting statistics (there might not be sufficient particles to establish a distribution from a short scan) [28], [29], [36], [40].…”
Section: Measuring Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%