2014
DOI: 10.1044/2014_lshss-14-0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Morphological Awareness Instruction to Improve Written Language Skills

Abstract: By integrating morphological awareness instruction into the services they provide, clinical scientists and other educators will be providing their students with a strong tool to aid written language skills.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the strategies recommended, leveraging morphological awareness has been integrated in language interventions with young monolingual children (e.g., Apel & Werfel, 2014) and has been shown to predict vocabulary growth at Grade 2 (Sparks & Deacon, 2015). Recently, there has been attention to the role of morphological knowledge in facilitating vocabulary acquisition in ELs (Lo, Anderson, & Bunch-Crump, 2016;Nagy, Carlisle, & Goodwin, 2014;R.…”
Section: Effective Vocabulary Instruction For Elsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the strategies recommended, leveraging morphological awareness has been integrated in language interventions with young monolingual children (e.g., Apel & Werfel, 2014) and has been shown to predict vocabulary growth at Grade 2 (Sparks & Deacon, 2015). Recently, there has been attention to the role of morphological knowledge in facilitating vocabulary acquisition in ELs (Lo, Anderson, & Bunch-Crump, 2016;Nagy, Carlisle, & Goodwin, 2014;R.…”
Section: Effective Vocabulary Instruction For Elsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has demonstrated that teaching children about morphemes improves word recognition, spelling, vocabulary, and comprehension (Bowers & Kirby, 2010;Kirk & Gillon, 2009;Nunes & Bryant, 2004). Thus, by infusing morphological awareness into instruction, learners are afforded a potentially viable tool not only for improving their decoding (Arnbak & Elbro, 2000;White, Power, & White, 1989) and language proficiency (Apel & Werfel, 2014) but also for developing their literacy skills, raising their awareness of the morphological structure of words and affixes, and improving their vocabulary and spelling (Claravall, 2016). Research (e.g., Carlisle, 2004;Öz, 2014) suggests a positive relationship between morphological knowledge and reading comprehension, as the more learners know about morphology, the more able they are to understand new words and comprehend texts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems with written accuracy children with PS experience may have a common origin: English writing is morphophonemic, tapping morphological and phonological knowledge (Apel & Lawrence, 2011;Apel & Werfel, 2014). Phonological processing on a non-word repetition task has been found to be impaired in children with PS (Gupta, MacWhinney, Feldman, & Sacco, 2003).…”
Section: The Neuroplasticity Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because English spelling is morphophonemic (Apel & Werfel, 2014), spelling also relies on knowledge of morphology (Apel & Lawrence, 2011) and phonology (Treiman & Kessler, 2004).…”
Section: Acquisition Of Written Language and Its Relationship To Spokmentioning
confidence: 99%