2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using motor imagery practice for improving motor performance – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
5
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many previous studies have made efforts to improve MI performance by using visual, haptic, electrical, and auditory feedback, and some have reported improvements (Ladda et al, 2021). However, training using sensory stimulation with tangible objects has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have made efforts to improve MI performance by using visual, haptic, electrical, and auditory feedback, and some have reported improvements (Ladda et al, 2021). However, training using sensory stimulation with tangible objects has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, MI can also induce the functional redistribution and regulation of neural circuits, remodeling the brain neural networks, and improving motor function relearning ability ( de Vries and Mulder, 2007 ; Gowda et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, repeated training can form a normal motor reflex arc, thus, promoting limb function recovery in the stroke patients ( Grabherr et al, 2015 ; López et al, 2019 ; Ladda et al, 2021 ). In the recent years, MIT has gradually been applied in rehabilitation as an active, low-cost, relatively simple, and efficient implementing method, attracting attention in active motor rehabilitation of stroke patients.…”
Section: Motor Imagery Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the small sample size and its age heterogeneity did not allow us to draw definitive conclusions since a certain interindividual variability or age effect could be expected when performing MI (Zich et al, 2017b;Wriessnegger et al, 2020;Ladda et al, 2021). An example of variability related to the level of expertise is the familiarity with a specific movement and the ability to produce MI (e.g., due to past sports experiences and familiarity with the MI task) (Hétu et al, 2013;Wriessnegger et al, 2014;Aoyama et al, 2020;Ladda et al, 2021). Moreover, this study did not take into account interindividual differences of ERD/S neural correlates when performing MI (Wriessnegger et al, 2020).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%