2004
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using MRI to Evaluate Anatomic Significance of Aortic Bifurcation, Right Renal Artery, and Conus Medullaris When Locating Lumbar Vertebral Segments

Abstract: The aortic bifurcation, the right renal artery, and the combination of these structures can be reliable landmarks for determining the lumbar vertebral segments on MRI or CT. However, conus medullaris cannot be considered a good landmark because of its variable locations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
54
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
54
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…36 The use of anatomic markers, including the aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris has been reported to be least reliable. Although Lee et al 37 report the position of the aortic bifurcation and right renal artery to be reliable landmarks for determining the lumbar vertebral segments on MR imaging and CT, these anatomic markers are widely believed to be less than satisfactory. 33 Although the right renal artery is usually located at the L1-2 disk space, 25% of the time it is either not imaged or is present at another location.…”
Section: Numbering Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 The use of anatomic markers, including the aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris has been reported to be least reliable. Although Lee et al 37 report the position of the aortic bifurcation and right renal artery to be reliable landmarks for determining the lumbar vertebral segments on MR imaging and CT, these anatomic markers are widely believed to be less than satisfactory. 33 Although the right renal artery is usually located at the L1-2 disk space, 25% of the time it is either not imaged or is present at another location.…”
Section: Numbering Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Variability may be seen in the position of the aortic bifurcation as it has been found at L4 in 83% of patients. 37 Lee et al have also shown that the conus medullaris should not be used as a landmark because its position is quite variable.…”
Section: Numbering Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of the consus medullaris is variable, ranging between middle third T12 to upper third L3 vertebrae. About 30% of patient population has a mean conus position at the lower third L1 vertebrae [15]. The lumbar spine MRI was reviewed in this case, the conus medullaris ended at the superior end plate of L1 verterbra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They found that aortic bifurcation at the level of L4 vertebra in 131 cases (70.1%), at the 4 th lumbar intervertebral disc in 23 cases (12.3%) and at the level of L5 vertebra in 33 cases (17.6%) [5]. Lee CH et al, studied 210 patients by MRI and found that aortic bifurcation level was at L4 vertebra (83%) [6]. In present study, the aortic bifurcation level was at L4 vertebra in 16 cases (64%) and at the level of L4-L5 intervertebral disc in 4 cases (16%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%