2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.736309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using multifield measurements to eliminate alignment degeneracies in the JWST testbed telescope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wavefront-error 3rd-order aberrations: The last step of the 9-step commissioning procedure for the JWST OTE on orbit is called Multi-Instrument, Multi-Field (MIMF) alignment [5][6] ; see Figure 1. The purpose of MIMF alignment is to make sure that we are correctly separating system wavefront error between the OTE and NIRCam (the primary wavefront sensor for the Observatory), so that the OTE mirror segments are not aligned so as to imprint the NIRCam wavefront error on the other SIs.…”
Section: Isim Element-level Requirements and Goals For Wavefront Error Performance Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wavefront-error 3rd-order aberrations: The last step of the 9-step commissioning procedure for the JWST OTE on orbit is called Multi-Instrument, Multi-Field (MIMF) alignment [5][6] ; see Figure 1. The purpose of MIMF alignment is to make sure that we are correctly separating system wavefront error between the OTE and NIRCam (the primary wavefront sensor for the Observatory), so that the OTE mirror segments are not aligned so as to imprint the NIRCam wavefront error on the other SIs.…”
Section: Isim Element-level Requirements and Goals For Wavefront Error Performance Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this example, the extreme points of the JWST science field show more than 1 micron PTV. The field-dependent wavefront is well represented by a linear combination of power and astigmatism, which varies linearly with field [2]. If a relationship between the MF errors and the SM position could be established, it should be possible to generate SM corrections based on the observed field dependent errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%