Using multiple per egress burstifiers for enhanced TCP performance in OBS networks

Abstract

Burst assembly mechanism is one of the fundamental factors that determine the performance of an optical burst switching (OBS) network. In this paper, we investigate the influence of the number of burstifiers on TCP performance for an OBS network. The goodput of TCP flows between an ingress node and an egress node traveling through an optical network is studied as the number of assembly buffers per destination varies. First, the burst-length independent losses resulting from the contention in the core OBS network using a non-void-filling burst scheduling algorithm, e.g., Horizon, are studied. Then, burst-length dependent losses arising as a result of void-filling scheduling algorithms, e.g., LAUC-VF, are studied for two different TCP flow models: FTP-type long-lived flows and variable size short-lived flows. Simulation results show that for both types of scheduling algorithms, both types of TCP flow models, and different TCP versions (Reno, Newreno and Sack), TCP goodput increases as the number of burst assemblers per egress node is increased for an OBS network employing timer-based assembly algorithm. The improvement from one burstifier to moderate number of burst assemblers is significant (15-50% depending on the burst loss probability, perhop processing delay, and the TCP version), but the goodput difference between moderate number of buffers and per-flow aggregation is relatively small, implying that an OBS edge A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the Sixth International Workshop on Optical Burst/Packet Switching (WOBS), Oct. 2006.G. Gurel · E. Karasan (B) Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey e-mail: ezhan@ee.bilkent.edu.tr G. Gurel e-mail: guray@ee.bilkent.edu.tr switch should use moderate number of assembly buffers per destination for enhanced TCP performance without substantially increasing the hardware complexity.

Improving RWA-OBS Formulation and Solution

“…The number of OBS routes considered is thus IWI x IAI x IFI x k. see [18]) or the goodput of TCP connections . In [19], authors shows that spreading the incoming load among several burstifiers (i.e., burst aggregation queues) reduces the impact of the synchronized loss on the goodput of TCP sources, but it mandates to reduce the size of the bursts to avoid long burstification time.…”

A Translucent OBS Node Architecture to Improve Traffic Emission and Loss Probability

“…Atop these issues, the definition of the aggregation queues is important. In [9], authors show that distributing the incoming traffic among several aggregation queues improves the goodput of TCP sources by reducing the impact of the synchronized loss. All those considerations are relevant, but their importance depends on the equipment and protocols.…”