2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using multiple remote sensing perspectives to identify and attribute land surface dynamics in Central Asia 2001–2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental findings of this study support previous region-wide research [12,14,19]. Unlike the previous studies, we applied a novel integrated methodology to measure and compare the impact of different environmental factors on vegetation dynamics rather than by the more traditional approach using pair-wise correlations between vegetation and possible drivers used in the cited papers.…”
Section: Factors Of Inter-annual Dynamics Of Irrigated Croplandssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fundamental findings of this study support previous region-wide research [12,14,19]. Unlike the previous studies, we applied a novel integrated methodology to measure and compare the impact of different environmental factors on vegetation dynamics rather than by the more traditional approach using pair-wise correlations between vegetation and possible drivers used in the cited papers.…”
Section: Factors Of Inter-annual Dynamics Of Irrigated Croplandssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The reported studies focused mainly on trend analysis of satellite-based vegetation indices and correlated those on a pair-wise basis with likely drivers such as in the recent study by [19]. Analyses of pair-wise correlations between vegetation trends and their drivers, though useful, neither provide information on the impacts of driving factors on vegetation dynamics on an annual basis, nor do they consider the cumulative impact of several factors on inter-annual vegetation changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, it could be assumed that changes in land management may also cause divergence between LOS and GSI (e.g., a change from one crop-type to another with different LOS/GSI characteristics), it is noteworthy that both converging trends and pixels with significant positive correlations between LOS and GSI are more pronounced for mixed forest than for the three natural forest biomes, which is also the case for croplands as compared to the three natural non-forest biomes ( Figures 4A and 6B). These differences may reflect anthropogenic management in the form of fertilization and irrigation that could alleviate climatic constraints on vegetation growth influencing concurrently on both phenology and productivity [74,76]. Moreover, it should be noted that areas of diverging trends type 2 in croplands are much smaller than it is the case for the three natural non-forest biomes ( Figure 4F).…”
Section: Converging/diverging Trends and Correlations Between Los Andmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is further supported by Xia [69] et al who revealed that the inter-biome variations in annual GPP can be better explained by the variations in seasonal maximal photosynthetic capacity than LOS. In addition to the impact from ongoing global warming and natural climate variability, the relationship between vegetation phenology and productivity could also be affected by changes in both/either vegetation metrics induced by anthropogenic land use/cover changes (e.g., deforestation/afforestation, land clearing, irrigation and fertilization, and changes in land management practices) [53,60,[74][75][76]. Whereas, it could be assumed that changes in land management may also cause divergence between LOS and GSI (e.g., a change from one crop-type to another with different LOS/GSI characteristics), it is noteworthy that both converging trends and pixels with significant positive correlations between LOS and GSI are more pronounced for mixed forest than for the three natural forest biomes, which is also the case for croplands as compared to the three natural non-forest biomes ( Figures 4A and 6B).…”
Section: Converging/diverging Trends and Correlations Between Los Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third generation GIMMS NDVI is a 15-day Maximum Value Composite that was acquired from seven different NOAA satellites (7,9,11,14,16,17,18), which have been processed using an adaptive Empirical Mode Decomposition. NDVI3g is appropriate for long-term studies of land surface trends in vegetation, seasonality and coupling between climate variability and vegetation over the last three decades [31,32].…”
Section: Normalized Difference Vegetation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%