2013
DOI: 10.1021/ct4005068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Multistate Reweighting to Rapidly and Efficiently Explore Molecular Simulation Parameters Space for Nonbonded Interactions

Abstract: Multistate reweighting methods such as the multistate Bennett acceptance ratio (MBAR) can predict free energies and expectation values of thermodynamic observables at poorly sampled or unsampled thermodynamic states using simulations performed at only a few sampled states combined with single point energy reevaluations of these samples at the unsampled states. In this study, we demonstrate the power of this general reweighting formalism by exploring the effect of simulation parameters controlling Coulomb and L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A switched cut-off between 1.0 and 1.1 nm was used for dispersion interactions and long-range dispersion corrections were applied to both energy and pressure. Use of these long-range corrections ensures that the free energy results are independent of cutoff radius, provided it is at least 0.9 nm [17,32]. As explained previously, the starting point for the improved model is the TraPPE force-field.…”
Section: -Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A switched cut-off between 1.0 and 1.1 nm was used for dispersion interactions and long-range dispersion corrections were applied to both energy and pressure. Use of these long-range corrections ensures that the free energy results are independent of cutoff radius, provided it is at least 0.9 nm [17,32]. As explained previously, the starting point for the improved model is the TraPPE force-field.…”
Section: -Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,21,22 The close relation between EMUS and MBAR indicates that error analysis of EMUS may provide insight into the sources of error in MBAR for these problems, but we do not pursue this idea further in the present work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, calculated with MBAR, which can take into account statistical correlations between the expectation of ∆U (T ) and the log partition function ∆G(T ) take into account [210].…”
Section: ∆U (T )−∆G(t ) Tmentioning
confidence: 99%