2019
DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2019.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation

Abstract: The purpose of this review article is to summarize our current understanding of the efficacy and safety of cardiac defibrillation with nanosecond shocks. Experiments in isolated hearts, using optical mapping of the electrical activity, have demonstrated that nanosecond shocks can defibrillate with lower energies than conventional millisecond shocks. Single defibrillation strength nanosecond shocks do not cause obvious damage, but repeated stimulation leads to deterioration of the hearts. In isolated myocytes, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing the non-steady-state transient kinetic regimes is beyond the time resolution of most experiments. As such, our model has the advantage of characterizing the transient initial kinetic regime, which should be important when exposing cells to increasingly used pulses with duration in the (sub)nanosecond range ( Pakhomov and Pakhomova, 2020 ; Neuber et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observing the non-steady-state transient kinetic regimes is beyond the time resolution of most experiments. As such, our model has the advantage of characterizing the transient initial kinetic regime, which should be important when exposing cells to increasingly used pulses with duration in the (sub)nanosecond range ( Pakhomov and Pakhomova, 2020 ; Neuber et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even for 200 ns shocks, there was still significant PI uptake, and repeat excitation of cardiomyocytes at the stimulation threshold using nanosecond shocks is not possible without electroporative damage. It should be noted that in whole hearts, the defibrillation threshold is almost 6 times higher than the stimulation threshold for 300 ns [9,28]. Thus, for whole heart experiments, there must be other factors at play that cause the safety factors of 300 ns and 10 ms to be similar and much greater than one.…”
Section: Comparison To Earlier Results On Electroporation With Millisecond Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Observing the non-steady state transient kinetic regimes is beyond the time resolution of most experiments. As such, our model has the advantage of characterizing the transient initial kinetic regime, which should be important when exposing cells to increasingly-used pulses with duration in the (sub)nanosecond range (63, 64).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, our model has the advantage of characterizing the transient initial kinetic regime, which should be important when exposing cells to increasingly-used pulses with duration in the (sub)nanosecond range (63,64).…”
Section: Electroporation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%