2014
DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2014.974718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using narrative inquiry to understand persistently disciplined middle school students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, how school factors are associated with the referral process and persistently referred students has received relatively little attention (Anderson & Ritter, 2017; Liu et al, 2022; Skiba et al, 2014). Prior studies have examined students’ experiences being persistently disciplined and labeled as a “frequent flyer” and the label’s deficit underpinnings (Kennedy-Lewis, 2012, 2013; Kennedy-Lewis & Murphy, 2016; Kennedy-Lewis et al, 2016). Another set of studies have used quantitative analyses to shed light on students receiving multiple disciplinary consequences, with a focus on the frequency of suspensions over a period of time rather than in a single school year (Fisher et al, 2021; Smith et al, 2020; Wilkerson & Afacan, 2021).…”
Section: A Better Understanding Of the Disciplinary Process: From Odr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, how school factors are associated with the referral process and persistently referred students has received relatively little attention (Anderson & Ritter, 2017; Liu et al, 2022; Skiba et al, 2014). Prior studies have examined students’ experiences being persistently disciplined and labeled as a “frequent flyer” and the label’s deficit underpinnings (Kennedy-Lewis, 2012, 2013; Kennedy-Lewis & Murphy, 2016; Kennedy-Lewis et al, 2016). Another set of studies have used quantitative analyses to shed light on students receiving multiple disciplinary consequences, with a focus on the frequency of suspensions over a period of time rather than in a single school year (Fisher et al, 2021; Smith et al, 2020; Wilkerson & Afacan, 2021).…”
Section: A Better Understanding Of the Disciplinary Process: From Odr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disproportionate use of students' suspension is noted in the United States, with evidence of higher suspension for students of color (Arcia, E., 2007;Bland & Mitchell, 2018;Gopalan & Nelson, 2019;Morris & Perry, 2017; Skiba et al, 2012;Sparks, 2018). Enormous adverse consequences of disproportionate suspensions have also been reported in literatures (Atkins et al, 2002;Balfanz et al, 2007;Fabelo et al, 2011;Gregory et al, 2010;Hoffmann, 2017;Kennedy-Lewis et al, 2016;Marchbanks et al, 2015;Noguera, 2003;Toldson, 2011;Weissman, 2015). For an example, suspensions funnel students of color out of classrooms and into jail cells (Weissman, 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Repeatedly disciplined students are more likely to drop out from schools (Fabelo et al, 2011). Suspended students are often viewed as problem students, a perception that is difficult to change (Kennedy- Lewis et al, 2016;Weissman, 2015). Suspension may lead to subsequent participation in juvenile and criminal justice systems (Fabelo et al, 2011;Noguera, 2003;Toldson, 2011), and it may have tremendous economic costs to the lives of suspended students, the school and society (Marchbanks et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chronic discipline risk index similarly calculates prevalence measured as the proportion of students from a target racial or ethnic group who have experienced multiple exclusionary disciplinary actions within a given school year. While there is no universal consensus on the number of ODRs or suspensions that constitutes chronic or persistently disciplined, most prior studies have defined persistently disciplined students as students who received two or more suspensions in a school year (Kennedy-Lewis, 2013; Kennedy-Lewis et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Dimensions Of School Discipline: An Analytic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%