Using narratives to impact health policy-making: a systematic review

Abstract

Background There is increased interest in using narratives or storytelling to influence health policies. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on the use of narratives to impact the health policy-making process. Methods Eligible study designs included randomised studies, non-randomised studies, process evaluation studies, economic studies, qualitative studies, stakeholder analyses, policy analyses, and case studies. The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), WHO Global Health Library, Communication and Mass Media Complete, and Google Scholar databases were searched. We followed standard systematic review methodology for study selection, data abstraction and risk of bias assessment. We synthesised the findings narratively and presented the results stratified according to the following stages of the policy cycle: (1) agenda-setting, (2) policy formulation, (3) policy adoption, (4) policy implementation and (5) policy evaluation. Additionally, we presented the knowledge gaps relevant to using narrative to impact health policy-making. Results Eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria, and included case studies ( n = 15), participatory action research ( n = 1), documentary analysis ( n = 1) and biographical method ( n = 1). The majority were of very low methodological quality. In addition, none of the studies formally evaluated the effectiveness of the narrative-based interventions. Findings suggest that narratives may have a positive influence when used as inspiration and empowerment tools to stimulate policy inquiries, as educational and awareness tools to initiate policy discussions and gain public support, and as advocacy and lobbying tools to formulate, adopt or implement policy. There is also evidence of undesirable effects of using narratives. In one case study, narrative use led to widespread insurance reimbursement of a therapy for breast cancer that was later proven to be ineffective. Another case study described how the use of narrative inappropriately exaggerated the perceived risk of a procedure, which led to limiting its use and preventing a large number of patients from its benefits. A third case study described how optimistic ‘cure’ or ‘hope’ stories of children with cancer were selectively used to raise money for cancer research that ignored the negative realities. The majority of included studies did not provide information on the definition or content of narratives, the theoretical framework underlying the narrative intervention or the possible predictors of the success of narrative interventions. Conclusion The existing evidence base precludes any robust inferences about the impact of narrative interventions on health policy-making. We discuss the implications of the findings for research and policy. ...

Neglected tropical disease as a ‘biographical disruption’: Listening to the narratives of affected persons to develop integrated people centred care in Liberia

“…Using everyday life as an entry point to narrative analysis allowed us to think critically and inductively about the influence of social categories on experience. This has provided a space for the needs and values of people living with a range of NTDs to be articulated, contributing to the generation of a larger ‘meta-narrative’ that will likely have more weight in NTD policy design and programme planning and the development of more people-centred health systems[36]. Production of a meta-narrative was guided using Frank’s narrative types as an analytical framework.…”

“…The integrated case management plan in Liberia is essential and a step in the right direction toward responding to these needs, however resource and systems constraints currently limit its potential in maximising support for individuals and their communities. Narrative has been recognised as something which should be given greater weight in policy formation and decision making[36]. The emotive power of narrative can be utilised to influence the value base of policy makers, which is frequently the driving force behind any policy decision[36].…”

“…Narrative has been recognised as something which should be given greater weight in policy formation and decision making[36]. The emotive power of narrative can be utilised to influence the value base of policy makers, which is frequently the driving force behind any policy decision[36]. The ‘meta-narrative’ presented here or specific case studies from within this data could be utilised by programme implementers within Liberia to leverage resources and instigate health systems and policy reform that is guided by the needs and values of affected persons’ and their communities.…”

Lessons learned from strategies for promotion of evidence-to-policy process in health interventions in the ECOWAS region: A rapid review

“…The use of policy analysis and policy cycle mechanisms including agenda setting, policy formulation and legitimation, implementation fidelity, and policy results has been shown to enhance evidence-to-policy process. 12 42 It is, however, vital to consider the use of policy cycle within the lens of political prioritization if policy implementation will be very successful and achieve the set objectives. In Benin, the policy development process suffered from inadequate uptake of evidence because the policy content and process were not completely in harmony with political goals.…”

Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study

“…A recent systematic review on the use of narratives to impact health policymaking did not find any trials. 61…”