2012
DOI: 10.1177/194008291200500408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Natural Marks to Estimate Free-Ranging Dog Canis Familiaris Abundance in a Mark-Resight Framework in Suburban Mumbai, India

Abstract: Free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) are a major conservation issue in the tropics and adopt many ecological roles, alternatively functioning as predators, prey, or competitors of wildlife in diverse environments. Dogs are also potential reservoirs of disease that can be transmitted to both wildlife and people. Therefore a range of management interventions have been suggested to control dog populations. In order to monitor interventions to decrease dog populations, estimates of their population size are import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated human-to-free-roaming dog ratio of 828:1 is relatively high compared to international studies presumably due to high human density in Dhaka City. The dog density (dogs/km 2 ) estimate in Dhaka City is moderate compared to other Asian cities which range from 5.78 in Timor Leste to 2,930 in Kathmandu, Nepal, with human-to-dog ratio ranging from 4.7:1 in Kathmandu to 23:1 in Timor Leste [ 15 , 18 , 19 ]. In contrast, Hossain et al, [ 4 ] estimated 14 dogs per km 2 with human-to-dog ratio of 120:1 in rural Bangladesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated human-to-free-roaming dog ratio of 828:1 is relatively high compared to international studies presumably due to high human density in Dhaka City. The dog density (dogs/km 2 ) estimate in Dhaka City is moderate compared to other Asian cities which range from 5.78 in Timor Leste to 2,930 in Kathmandu, Nepal, with human-to-dog ratio ranging from 4.7:1 in Kathmandu to 23:1 in Timor Leste [ 15 , 18 , 19 ]. In contrast, Hossain et al, [ 4 ] estimated 14 dogs per km 2 with human-to-dog ratio of 120:1 in rural Bangladesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high proportion of owned dogs that were roaming in the streets highlights the need for good legislation on responsible dog ownership, as well as strict implementation of the law to avoid the roaming of owned dogs (WHO and WSPA, 1990;ICAMC, 2007;OIE, 2010 Therefore, other reliable marking method such as photographic recapture method may be used to reduce the bias since there is no physical disturbance to the dogs (Punjabi et al, 2012;Belo et al, 2015).. Nevertheless, this study generated baseline data on the population of owned and stray dogs in Bhutan which will be useful for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of dog population and rabies control programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimate of the total roaming dog population may be requested for planning or evaluating an intervention. However, this measure of abundance is time-consuming to establish, requiring repeated surveys of naturally or artificially marked samples of roaming dogs (for example [ 7 ] and [ 8 ]); the estimates are also subject to biases that are difficult to quantify. Abundance also requires clear definition in the context of a population consisting of a mixture of unowned and unconfined owned dogs, should it for example include those owned dogs that may only venture out of their owner’s property for a few minutes each morning?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%