Using network analysis to compare bibliographic database journal coverage

Cowhitt, Thomas; Cutts, Angela

doi:10.1080/1941126x.2020.1790952

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2005, De Moya-Anegón et al (2007 observed that 15% of journals published in Scopus were in a language other than English, compared to 26% in Ulrich's Core collection. Such a disproportion was also confirmed by the study of Cowhitt and Cutts (2020), who surveyed journal lists in thirteen different databases and found that their areas of overlap "overwhelmingly" included American and British publications. The perceived imbalance has led to such proposals as indicators of the linguistic diversity of cited items as a tool for heterogeneizing research (Linkov et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Global and National Visibility of Management Research Methodology Scholars – The Case of Poland

Kosch

Szarucki

Skačkauskienė

2023

Business: Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developing research methodology contributes to better management research outputs, links better management theory to business practice, as well as enriches the academic training received by the students at universities. Researchers might be tempted to provide generalizations on management research methodology based on global bibliographic databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science, and draw conclusions on the possible educational outline. However, since students are educated mainly in national languages, the literature in these languages might gain priority over more internationally recognized publications available only in English. Then, the question arises if scholars who might be recognized globally due to their presence in large, international bibliographic databases retain their visibility and influence at the national level. We conduct a comparative bibliometric study using Scopus, Web of Science, and BazEkon to answer this question. Our research reveals that for the case of Poland, information and social networks of management methodology scholars do not support the assumption of direct visibility of such global scholars at the national level, thus putting into question the reliability of global bibliographic databases to study management at the national level.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%