2016
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-4143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Newborn Screening Bloodspots for Research: Public Preferences for Policy Options

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Retaining residual newborn screening (NBS) bloodspots for medical research remains contentious. To inform this debate, we sought to understand public preferences for, and reasons for preferring, alternative policy options. METHODS:We assessed preferences among 4 policy options for research use of residual bloodspots through a bilingual national Internet survey of a representative sample of Canadians. Fifty percent of respondents were randomly assigned to select reasons supporting these preferences.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We probed attitudes towards the role of the public in healthcare and medical research policy within a survey study on newborn screening, which included specific items about population screening in newborns ( Miller et al 2015 ), and research opportunities with leftover blood samples generated through newborn screening ( Hayeems et al 2016 ), as well as general items regarding healthcare and research policy. Items in the research context used the terminology “medical research” to align with the biomedical nature of some of the items (e.g., references to blood samples and curing disease).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We probed attitudes towards the role of the public in healthcare and medical research policy within a survey study on newborn screening, which included specific items about population screening in newborns ( Miller et al 2015 ), and research opportunities with leftover blood samples generated through newborn screening ( Hayeems et al 2016 ), as well as general items regarding healthcare and research policy. Items in the research context used the terminology “medical research” to align with the biomedical nature of some of the items (e.g., references to blood samples and curing disease).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some published research with varied populations supports these comments, indicating that the public does not want to be refer each research project that uses their biospecimens (Simon et al 2011; Brown et al 2016; Garrison et al 2016). Yet, additional evidence supports a conclusion that the public wants to know about research with their biospecimens and more importantly, they want to be asked for their permission (Hendrix et al 2013; Javitt 2013; Botkin et al 2014, Hayeems et al 2016). The current post-play attitude results further underscore the importance of seeking some type of consent for this type of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Like the creators of other online surveys, we determined participation and completion rates in place of traditional response rates. 13,16 The participation rate was 12.4%, calculated as the proportion of opened surveys to e-mails sent (438/3528). The completion rate was 63.7%, reflecting 279 completed surveys out of the 438 opened surveys.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%