5Non-invasive genotyping methods have become key elements of wildlife research over the last 6 two decades, but their widespread adoption is limited by high costs, low success rates, and high 7 error rates. The information lost when genotyping success is low may lead to decreased precision 8 in animal population densities which could misguide conservation and management actions. Single 9 nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provide a promising alternative to traditionally used 10 microsatellites as SNPs allow amplification of shorter DNA fragments, are less prone to 11 genotyping errors, and produce results that are easily shared among laboratories. Here, we outline 12 a detailed protocol for cost-effective and accurate noninvasive SNP genotyping using highly 13 multiplexed amplicon sequencing optimized for degraded DNA. We validated this method for 14 individual identification by genotyping 216 scats, 18 hairs and 15 tissues from coyotes (Canis 15 latrans). Our genotyping success rate for scat samples was 93%, and 100% for hair and tissue, 16 representing a substantial increase compared to previous microsatellite-based studies at a cost of 17 under $5 per PCR replicate (excluding labor). The accuracy of the genotypes was further 18 corroborated in that genotypes from scats matching known, GPS-collared coyotes were always 19 located within the territory of the known individual. We also show that different levels of 20 multiplexing produced similar results, but that PCR product cleanup strategies can have 21 2 substantial effects on genotyping success. By making noninvasive genotyping more affordable, 22 accurate, and efficient, this research may allow for a substantial increase in the use of 23 noninvasive methods to monitor and conserve free-ranging wildlife populations. 24 Keywords 25 Fecal DNA, individual identification, next-generation sequencing, noninvasive samples, single 26 nucleotide polymorphisms, SNP genotyping. 27 28 29 48 rates when using fragmented DNA from noninvasive sources (Morin, Luikart, & Wayne, 2004).49 Unlike microsatellite genotyping, which use size-based allele determination, SNP alleles are 50 provided directly in the DNA sequence, which facilitates automated allele calling and results that 51 are easily shared among laboratories and research groups.52 4 Recent SNP genotyping approaches for noninvasive samples include the Fluidigm 53 Dynamic Array platform (Fluidigm Corp) and the MassARRAY platform from Sequenom. The 54 Fluidigm platform in particular has produced high genotyping success and low error rates for 55 both fecal and hair samples (Kraus et al., 2015; Von Thaden et al., 2017). However, these 56 techniques require specialized equipment often rendering them prohibitively expensive for 57 wildlife research (Andrews, De Barba, Russello, & Waits, 2018; Carroll et al., 2018). A largely 58 unexplored strategy is to amplify many SNPs together in multiplex PCR and sequence them 59 using high-throughput sequencers. Such genotyping by amplicon sequencing (GBAS) is both 60 cost-effective, a...