2019
DOI: 10.1177/1356389019869036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using non-participant observation to uncover mechanisms: Insights from a realist evaluation

Abstract: This article outlines how a realist evaluation of dementia care in hospitals used non-participant observation to support the refinement and testing of mechanisms likely to lead to the use of person-centred care. We found that comments and explanations of their actions from hospital staff during observation periods provided insights into the reasoning that generated their actions for care in real time. This informed subsequent data collection and analysis. Two worked examples of mechanisms first identified duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participant and non-participant observations can also be used for collecting information relevant to the structures or the context of the social agents. (Handley et al, 2020). Participatory approaches such as Photovoice methods are also valuable as the images participants provide illustrate metaphors for their life situations, experiences, and/or emotions (Woodgate et al, 2017).…”
Section: Qualitative Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participant and non-participant observations can also be used for collecting information relevant to the structures or the context of the social agents. (Handley et al, 2020). Participatory approaches such as Photovoice methods are also valuable as the images participants provide illustrate metaphors for their life situations, experiences, and/or emotions (Woodgate et al, 2017).…”
Section: Qualitative Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The care concept of the SCU was developed by practitioners and guided by their experience, and the initial programme theory was based on their assumptions and research evidence. However, the changes, extensions and re nements to the initial programme theory yielded by the process evaluation show how important empirical data from the speci c context are for understanding the mechanisms [50]. We gathered data from different contexts, namely, from SCUs and NSNHs, and the constant comparison of the contexts and the interventions, along with a qualitative data-driven research paradigm, enhanced the understanding of the potentially unknown active ingredients of the care concept.…”
Section: Methodological Discussion Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study shows that complex programmes rely on mechanisms that can be unexpected and that elude initial assessment by researchers. Therefore, it is advisable to include empirical data in the development of programme theories of complex programmes [49,50]. To further develop the theoretical understanding of dementia care in long-term care, future research should pay more attention to the questions of what works for whom under what circumstances [51] and thereby contribute to an overarching understanding of the active ingredients and their mechanisms of impact of specialised dementia care.…”
Section: Promotion Of Relaxation Engagement In Activities and Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data will be collected via videorecording of the group reflections approved by the participants. Videorecording as a data collection method is commonly used in, among others, nursing research 61 62. According to Caldwell and Atwal, videorecording can be considered non-participant observation 61.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Caldwell and Atwal, videorecording can be considered non-participant observation 61. By using non-participant observation, participants’ real-time reasoning can be recorded, which can reveal the latent mechanisms 62. This is considered an appropriate approach for the aim of the forthcoming study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%