2016
DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Nonexperts for Annotating Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Mentions in Product Labeling: A Feasibility Study

Abstract: BackgroundBecause vital details of potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are often described in free-text structured product labels, manual curation is a necessary but expensive step in the development of electronic drug-drug interaction information resources. The use of nonexperts to annotate potential drug-drug interaction (PDDI) mentions in drug product label annotation may be a means of lessening the burden of manual curation.ObjectiveOur goal was to explore the practicality of using nonexpert p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 5 This difficulty results from the need to initially recognize potential clinically significant toxicities (ie, AEs) reported as clinical signs, symptoms, or medical concepts and evaluate these AEs as consequences of a DDI. 3,4,6 The identification of DDIs between an established older drug and a newly approved product is particularly challenging because unless these older products are the representative drug probe for a particular drug class or a particular type of interaction (ie, ketoconazole or ritonavir representing CYP3A4 inhibitors and rifampin representing CYP3A4 inducers), additional PK simulation models and studies are not conducted to evaluate DDIs with newly authorized drug products. Drug manufacturers have to rely on reports of potential DDI-related toxicities from their postmarketing surveillance of postmarketing safety data, including those reported in the published literature, to recognize and evaluate new DDIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 5 This difficulty results from the need to initially recognize potential clinically significant toxicities (ie, AEs) reported as clinical signs, symptoms, or medical concepts and evaluate these AEs as consequences of a DDI. 3,4,6 The identification of DDIs between an established older drug and a newly approved product is particularly challenging because unless these older products are the representative drug probe for a particular drug class or a particular type of interaction (ie, ketoconazole or ritonavir representing CYP3A4 inhibitors and rifampin representing CYP3A4 inducers), additional PK simulation models and studies are not conducted to evaluate DDIs with newly authorized drug products. Drug manufacturers have to rely on reports of potential DDI-related toxicities from their postmarketing surveillance of postmarketing safety data, including those reported in the published literature, to recognize and evaluate new DDIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 In the long term, we plan to re-use data used to study the quality of life of patients with breast cancer and thus improve our processes similar to the one presented in previous work. 6 We could measure the impact of the resource, for example, on annotation 57,58 and classification tasks. 59 Similarly, we will apply our method to social media in English to extend existing CHV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%