Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundNormalization Process Theory (NPT) identifies, characterises and explains key mechanisms that promote and inhibit the implementation, embedding and integration of new health techniques, technologies and other complex interventions. A large body of literature that employs NPT to inform feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions has now emerged. The aims of this review were to review this literature; to identify and characterise the uses and limits of NPT in research on the implementation and integration of healthcare interventions; and to explore NPT’s contribution to understanding the dynamics of these processes.MethodsA qualitative systematic review was conducted. We searched Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for articles with empirical data in peer-reviewed journals that cited either key papers presenting and developing NPT, or the NPT Online Toolkit (www.normalizationprocess.org). We included in the review only articles that used NPT as the primary approach to collection, analysis or reporting of data in studies of the implementation of healthcare techniques, technologies or other interventions. A structured data extraction instrument was used, and data were analysed qualitatively.ResultsSearches revealed 3322 citations. We show that after eliminating 2337 duplicates and broken or junk URLs, 985 were screened as titles and abstracts. Of these, 101 were excluded because they did not fit the inclusion criteria for the review. This left 884 articles for full-text screening. Of these, 754 did not fit the inclusion criteria for the review. This left 130 papers presenting results from 108 identifiable studies to be included in the review. NPT appears to provide researchers and practitioners with a conceptual vocabulary for rigorous studies of implementation processes. It identifies, characterises and explains empirically identifiable mechanisms that motivate and shape implementation processes. Taken together, these mean that analyses using NPT can effectively assist in the explanation of the success or failure of specific implementation projects. Ten percent of papers included critiques of some aspect of NPT, with those that did mainly focusing on its terminology. However, two studies critiqued NPT emphasis on agency, and one study critiqued NPT for its normative focus.ConclusionsThis review demonstrates that researchers found NPT useful and applied it across a wide range of interventions. It has been effectively used to aid intervention development and implementation planning as well as evaluating and understanding implementation processes themselves. In particular, NPT appears to have offered a valuable set of conceptual tools to aid understanding of implementation as a dynamic process.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Engaging with theory: from theoretically informed to theoretically informative improvement research

“…Since theorising is an iterative and recursive process,12 16 it is important to consider previous empirical studies building on the relevant theory rather than solely rely on the original theoretical account 16. Whether the theoretical approach is chosen prospectively (prior to data collection) or retrospectively (at the data analysis stage, as is the case in the Jones et al 13 paper), this enables the researcher to paint the state-of-the art picture of what is already known, identify gaps in theoretical knowledge and, subsequently, focus on addressing them.…”

Barriers and facilitators to reducing anticholinergic burden from the perspectives of patients, their carers, and healthcare professionals: A protocol for qualitative evidence synthesis

“…Normalization process theory (NPT) will serve as the underpinning conceptual framework to explore, understand, and explain the qualitative data in relation to factors that act as barriers or facilitators to ACB reduction. NPT is a well‐developed theory for understanding such factors from the perspective of intervention implementation . NPT consists of four constructs: coherence, which addresses the sense‐making work that people participating in an intervention have to undertake; cognitive participation, the engagement work that is undertaken to ensure participants “buy into” the intervention; collective action, the operational work, and tasks that people have to do to enact the intervention; and reflexive monitoring, the appraisal work people undertake in relation to the intervention .…”

“…[28][29][30][31][32] NPT consists of four constructs: coherence, which addresses the sense-making work that people participating in an intervention have to undertake; cognitive participation, the engagement work that is undertaken to ensure participants "buy into" the intervention; collective action, the operational work, and tasks that people have to do to enact the intervention; and reflexive monitoring, the appraisal work people undertake in relation to the intervention. 29 Data will be analyzed using a frame-work underpinned by NPT. A coding sheet detailing and describing the themes required to be explored by NPT will be developed and agreed by the team.…”

Participatory implementation research in the field of migrant health: Sustainable changes and ripple effects over time

“…These have been used successfully as a conceptual framework to enhance understanding of levers and barriers to implementation for a variety of interventions. 14,15 There is, however, a lack of follow-up studies in the literature exploring whether new routines have been sustained over time. 15…”

“…14,15 There is, however, a lack of follow-up studies in the literature exploring whether new routines have been sustained over time. 15…”