1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02172274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using obsessions as reinforcers with and without mild reductive procedures to decrease inappropriate behaviors of children with autism

Abstract: We assessed the effectiveness of using the obsessions of children with autism to reduce their inappropriate behaviors. Baseline consisted of a traditional differential reinforcement of other behaviors (DRO) in which food reinforcers were provided contingent upon a period of nonoccurrence of the inappropriate behaviors. Then, three treatment conditions were assessed using a multielement design. One condition provided objects of obsession as reinforcers for periods of nonoccurrence of the inappropriate behaviors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the category of intervention research on CI can still be subdivided into consequence- and antecedent-based approaches with the caveat that the CI, itself, is being used as the reinforcer (i.e., consequence) or stimulus that elicits appropriate behavior (i.e., antecedent). Consequence-based uses of CI include the work of Charlop-Christy and Haymes in which the CI was used as either a contingent reinforcer to improve children’s task accuracy (Charlop-Christy and Haymes 1998), or as a differential reinforcer delivered contingently on the non-occurrence of inappropriate behaviors (Charlop-Christy and Haymes 1996). Interestingly, Charlop-Christy and Haymes (1996) found engagement in stereotypic behavior or a CI to be a more powerful reinforcer than food.…”
Section: A Framework For Behavioral and Psychosocial Interventions Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the category of intervention research on CI can still be subdivided into consequence- and antecedent-based approaches with the caveat that the CI, itself, is being used as the reinforcer (i.e., consequence) or stimulus that elicits appropriate behavior (i.e., antecedent). Consequence-based uses of CI include the work of Charlop-Christy and Haymes in which the CI was used as either a contingent reinforcer to improve children’s task accuracy (Charlop-Christy and Haymes 1998), or as a differential reinforcer delivered contingently on the non-occurrence of inappropriate behaviors (Charlop-Christy and Haymes 1996). Interestingly, Charlop-Christy and Haymes (1996) found engagement in stereotypic behavior or a CI to be a more powerful reinforcer than food.…”
Section: A Framework For Behavioral and Psychosocial Interventions Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winter-Messiers (2007) suggested using strengthbased interventions in which the special interests of children with ASD are used in positive ways to enhance their performance. In some studies, the special interests of these children were used as contingent reinforcers to increase task performance or decrease the inappropriate behaviours of children with ASD (Charlop-Christy & Haymes, 1996. Other studies incorporated the restricted interests of these children into activities or interventions to teach skills (Angell, Nicholson, Watts, & Blum, 2011;Baker, 2000;Baker, Koegel, & Koegel, 1998;Campbell & Tincani, 2011;Keeling, Myles, Gagnon, & Simpson, 2003;Koegel et al, 2012;Spencer, Simpson, Day, & Buster, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some children engage in unusual stereotypic behaviors such as hand flapping, looking at their unusually postured fingers, or rocking back and forth. Other children tend to use objects in a restricted and inappropriate way, such as turning over a car and playing with the wheels, spinning any and all objects, or staring at illuminated toys through their peripheral vision (Charlop-Christy & Haymes, 1996. These stereotypic behaviors can interfere with mastery of academic skills if children cannot be redirected to school materials and/or instruction and may interfere with social skill development when peers refrain from initiating with socially odd children (Elliott, Dobbin, Rose, & Soper, 1994).…”
Section: Restricted and Repetitive Maladaptive Patterns Of Behavior mentioning
confidence: 98%