Using Overt and Covert Items in Self-Report Personality Tests: Susceptibility to Faking and Identifiability of Possible Fakers

Abstract

Self-report personality tests widely used in clinical, medical, forensic, and organizational areas of psychological assessment are susceptible to faking. Several approaches have been developed to prevent or detect faking, which are based on the use of faking warnings, ipsative items, social desirability scales, and validity scales. The approach proposed in this work deals with the use of overt items (the construct is clear to test-takers) and covert items (the construct is obscure to test-takers). Covert items are expected to be more resistant to faking than overt items. Two hundred sixty-seven individuals were presented with an alexithymia scale. Two experimental conditions were considered. Respondents in the faking condition were asked to reproduce the profile of an alexithymic individual, whereas those in the sincere condition were not asked to exhibit a particular alexithymia profile. The items of the scale were categorized as overt or covert by expert psychotherapists and analyzed through Rasch models. Respondents in the faking condition were able to exhibit measures of alexithymia in the required direction. This occurred for both overt and covert items, but to a greater extent for overt items. Differently from overt items, covert items defined a latent variable whose meaning was shared between respondents in the sincere and faking condition, and resistant to deliberate distortion. Rasch fit statistics indicated unexpected responses more often for respondents in the faking condition than for those in the sincere condition and, in particular, for the responses to overt items by individuals in the faking condition. More than half of the respondents in the faking condition showed a drift rate (difference between the alexithymia levels estimated on the responses to overt and covert items) significantly larger than that observed in the respondents in the sincere condition.

The Anxiety-Buffer Hypothesis in the Time of COVID-19: When Self-Esteem Protects From the Impact of Loneliness and Fear on Anxiety and Depression

“…Due to the observational/correlational nature of the research design, it was not possible to establish a causal relationship among variables, but only predictive relationships – still in line with the study purpose ( Fiedler et al, 2011 ). Moreover, the self-report nature of the online survey may convey intrinsic biases related to social desirability and other well-known issues ( Vidotto et al, 2018 ). Other limitations of this study were the prevalence of females in the sample and that the fact that geographical areas in Italy were not equally represented – although preliminary analyses showed no associated effects.…”

An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen–Revised Adolescents

“…There are several applications of IRT to the development and validation of measurement instruments (e.g., Anselmi et al, 2011, 2015; Anselmi, Vianello, & Robusto, 2013; Anselmi, Vianello, Voci, et al, 2013; C. Brown et al, 2015; Childs et al, 2000; Colledani, Anselmi, et al, 2018; Colledani et al, 2019a, 2019b; Colledani, Robusto, et al, 2018; Da Dalt et al, 2013, 2015, 2017; Rossi Ferrario et al, 2019; Rouse et al, 1999; Sotgiu et al, 2019; Vidotto et al, 2018; Zanon et al, 2016). IRT has been used to investigate the psychometric properties of different instruments for measuring problem gambling.…”

Short-Term Prediction of Bike-Sharing Demand Using Multi-Source Data: A Spatial-Temporal Graph Attentional LSTM Approach

“…Second, other types of external effects, such as metro passenger data and socioeconomic factors, should be considered to improve the prediction accuracy. In addition, the data for users' personal characteristics can be limited, as indicated by previous research [57,58]. How to obtain the various and accurate personal data for research is worth investigating in future work.…”