2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00290-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using patient-specific hemodynamic response functions in combined EEG-fMRI studies in epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
57
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This method allows an evaluation of the HRF by assuming that it is the same for each event, but without constraining its shape. However, for the purpose of this study, the method was used to refine the calculation of the delay of the HRF in areas that showed BOLD effects in the primary statistical analysis, used as regions of interest (Kang et al, 2003). The use of a single canonical model HRF in the primary analysis would result in an estimated HRF that is relatively similar to the model.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This method allows an evaluation of the HRF by assuming that it is the same for each event, but without constraining its shape. However, for the purpose of this study, the method was used to refine the calculation of the delay of the HRF in areas that showed BOLD effects in the primary statistical analysis, used as regions of interest (Kang et al, 2003). The use of a single canonical model HRF in the primary analysis would result in an estimated HRF that is relatively similar to the model.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HRF was projected for a region of interest of 10 significantly activated voxels, centered on the voxel with the highest t value in the cluster. An HRF was projected over a 64-s time window (from 15 s prior to the EEG spike to 48 s after the spike) using a Fourier basis set of 20 sine-cosine waves (Josephs et al, 1997;Kang et al, 2003). Projected HRFs were sampled at one data point per second ( Fig.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Patient-specific Hrfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tests presented along the study reveal the influence of each parameter in the accuracy of BOLD activation maps, and also its contribution to false positives. To model the haemodynamic function a standard Gamma function with derivatives was used [2] (with a FWHM of 3 s [3] and a mean lag of 5 s [4]). Four and twenty-four spikes were analyzed, respectively, for patients 1 and 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%