2002
DOI: 10.5334/2002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Peer Teams to Lead Online Discussions

Abstract: Abstract:This study investigated an online course in which groups of four students were used to lead online discussions. The teams were examined for their ability to bring instructional design, discourse facilitation, and direct instruction to the discussions. The setting was a graduate-level communications networks course delivered asynchronously to a cohort group of 17 adults enrolled for professional development education. Interviews, questionnaires, and content analyses of the discussion transcripts indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
2
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
104
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, peer facilitation reduces the instructor's "authoritarian presence" in the discourse (Rourke & Anderson 2002, p. 4), thereby fostering more open, authentic discussion among students. Indeed, some research suggests students feel more comfortable expressing their opinions in peer-facilitated discussions (Baran & Correia, 2009;Cheung & Hew, 2010;Correia & Davis, 2007;Rourke & Anderson, 2002). Limited evidence suggests students may post longer messages and post messages more frequently (Poole, 2000).…”
Section: Facilitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, peer facilitation reduces the instructor's "authoritarian presence" in the discourse (Rourke & Anderson 2002, p. 4), thereby fostering more open, authentic discussion among students. Indeed, some research suggests students feel more comfortable expressing their opinions in peer-facilitated discussions (Baran & Correia, 2009;Cheung & Hew, 2010;Correia & Davis, 2007;Rourke & Anderson, 2002). Limited evidence suggests students may post longer messages and post messages more frequently (Poole, 2000).…”
Section: Facilitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estes resultados parecem alinhados com os estudos existentes sobre os alunos como facilitadores de discussão online (Rourke & Anderson, 2002) que sugerem que esta abordagem é benéfica não só porque incentivar o envolvimento dos alunos, mas também porque melhorar os resultados da aprendizagem.…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified
“…This form of distance delivery places a premium on quality student-student interaction that is supported in a format that allows for asynchronous reflection and scholarly expression in text format. This high level of studentstudent interaction capacity allows for reduced student-teacher interaction, the capacity to make effective use of peer moderators (Rourke and Anderson, 2002), and facilitates students sharing and discussing student-content learning resources gathered or created by students (Collis and Moonen, 2001). …”
Section: Web-based Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warschauer (1998) finds that the use of strategies such as re-reading the text, soliciting help, or using a dictionary aids the comprehension of text-based, computer-mediated discussions. Anderson (2002) maintains that the teaching of meta-cognitive strategies can help students develop stronger language learning skills.…”
Section: Learner -Content Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%