Mechanistic Modelling in Pig &Amp; Poultry Production
DOI: 10.1079/9781845930707.0209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using physiological models to define environmental control strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that exposure to both heat and cold stress in slaughter birds has profound and detrimental effects on meat quality in individual birds that do not succumb to thermal stress mortality (Mitchell 1999(Mitchell , 2008Mitchell et al 2007). This constitutes a major production problem due to downgrading, and probably reflects an important accompanying welfare concern as the surviving birds have been exposed to hostile thermal environments that will impose stress upon their thermoregulatory capacity, may involve marked changes in deep body temperature and will have depleted both energy and water reserves of the stressed birds Mitchell 2006Mitchell , 2008. Thermal stress in transit constitutes a major threat to the welfare and production efficiency of broiler chickens and the provision of sound strategies for the prevention or alleviation of these problems in commercial practice is of paramount importance (Mitchell 2006;Mitchell and Kettlewell 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that exposure to both heat and cold stress in slaughter birds has profound and detrimental effects on meat quality in individual birds that do not succumb to thermal stress mortality (Mitchell 1999(Mitchell , 2008Mitchell et al 2007). This constitutes a major production problem due to downgrading, and probably reflects an important accompanying welfare concern as the surviving birds have been exposed to hostile thermal environments that will impose stress upon their thermoregulatory capacity, may involve marked changes in deep body temperature and will have depleted both energy and water reserves of the stressed birds Mitchell 2006Mitchell , 2008. Thermal stress in transit constitutes a major threat to the welfare and production efficiency of broiler chickens and the provision of sound strategies for the prevention or alleviation of these problems in commercial practice is of paramount importance (Mitchell 2006;Mitchell and Kettlewell 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be proposed that the thermal micro-environment within the transport containers or vehicles is extremely vulnerable to changes in external thermal conditions. As such, in response to any potential increase in thermal load it poses the greatest threat to the animals' welfare and well-being (Appleby and Lawrence, 1999;Mitchell and Kettlewell, 1998;Cockram and Mitchell, 1999;Mitchell, 2006). Adverse thermal conditions resulting in either heat or cold stress may lead to reduced welfare, overt tissue damage or injury and increases in mortality in transit (Mitchell, 2006;Mitchell and Kettlewell, 2006;Mitchell and Kettlewell, 2008).…”
Section: Thermal Stress -Impacts and Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various components of the topic have previously been discussed and reviewed (e.g. Mitchell, 2006aMitchell, , 2006bKettlewell, 2004a, 2004b;2008a, 2008b but it is timely to incorporate existing knowledge of the physical aspects of transport practices and environments with complementary knowledge of the physiology and behaviour of the major types of poultry that are transported. It is also relevant to assess how these breeds and species of birds are equipped to respond to "transportation stress" and how these characteristics have been influenced by genetic selection for production traits.…”
Section: Broiler Chickens -Meat Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, transport of bulls housed at increased space allowance (4.2 m 2 /bull) resulted in a greater cortisol response, albeit still within a normal physiological range. The effect of transport for up to 0, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 hours followed by 24 hours recovery on live weight, physiological and haematological responses of bulls was investigated by Earley and O"Riordan (2006a;2006b). Bulls travelling for 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 h lost 4.7, 4.5, 5.7, 6.6 and 7.5% live weight compared with the baseline.…”
Section: Water and Feeding Interval Journey Times And Resting Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation