2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using PIPS to Minimize Causes of Delay in Saudi Arabian Construction Projects: University Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kashiwagi [42] proposed a system called performance information procurement system (PIPS) instead of lower bidder by filtering selected bidder in four steps. Alzara et al [43] proposed to use PIPS to mitigate anticipated delays for campus of university in Northern of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It is recommended to review and revise projectawarding system used in Kuwait especially in large governmental projects.…”
Section: Project Management Skills Related Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kashiwagi [42] proposed a system called performance information procurement system (PIPS) instead of lower bidder by filtering selected bidder in four steps. Alzara et al [43] proposed to use PIPS to mitigate anticipated delays for campus of university in Northern of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It is recommended to review and revise projectawarding system used in Kuwait especially in large governmental projects.…”
Section: Project Management Skills Related Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the most influencing factors for are poor site management and supervision by contractors, conflict between the main contractor and subcontractor, poor planning and scheduling of projects by the contractor, delays in material or equipment delivery and delays in handing over construction site to the contractor. Alzara et al [16] submit a case study of university construction project to minimize the causes of delays in Saudi Arabian construction projects using the Performance Information Procurement (PIP) System.…”
Section: Construction Project Delays Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, investments in the construction industry face several risks when the contract administration practices do not adequately perform and poor contract administration works against the industry sustainability. Poor construction contract administration may refer to poor planning [5,6], poor communication and coordination [7], lack of systems [7] misunderstanding of processes [7], lack of skilled personnel [8], unclear roles [7], lack of training [7,8] and lack of performance measurement [7]. Yet the construction contract administration (CCA) team needs more training on better practices [7][8][9][10][11], to act responsively [12] with a sufficient level of competency [7,13] and to efficiently monitor the contract [7], and to make efficient decisions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= Standardized factor loading of the observed variable i (i =15,6,11,10,10,4,7,5,8,4,13) for groups j = 1 to 11); RFW1i = Relative factor weight (within group) of the observed variable; RFW2i = Applicable relative factor weight (within group) of the observed variable (i.e., RFW2i = 0 for not applicable observed variable i); RFW3i = Updated relative factor weight (within group) of the observed variable i; Ci = conformity of observed variable based on actual implementation (i.e., Ci = 0 to 100 or NaN); SFLj = Standardized factor loading of group j (j = 1 to 11); RGW1j = Relative weight of group j; RGW2j = Applicable weight of group j (i.e., RGW2j = 0 if all observed variables within group j are not applicable); RGW3j = Updated weight of group j; FW2i = Overall final factor weight based on group availability and observed variable availability; Pj = Group performance; and % Pj = Group performance index; and CCAPI = CCA performance index.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%