2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in a membrane contactor for CO2 absorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
90
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition in ordinary equipment as towers operating problems such as flooding and channelizing can be problematic. Therefore, many researchers studies on using hollow fiber membranes as a new equipment to absorb organic materials, carbon dioxide, and other acidic gases [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Also In recent years effect of different parameters in separation process using hollow fibers have been studied [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition in ordinary equipment as towers operating problems such as flooding and channelizing can be problematic. Therefore, many researchers studies on using hollow fiber membranes as a new equipment to absorb organic materials, carbon dioxide, and other acidic gases [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Also In recent years effect of different parameters in separation process using hollow fibers have been studied [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is only applicable to semi-crystalline polymers, and in addition to the mechanical stretching process, it requires several thermal post-treatments to promote crystallinity and avoid membrane shrinkage. [19] There are few studies in the literature on the fabrication of open-cell foams containing polymer/filler composites using leachable salts with PP [20] polymethylmetacrylate, polysulfone [2] Amine solution (AMP, MEA, MDEA) À Falk-Pedersen and Dannström [27] À Kim et al [28] NaOH solution, MEA solution À Matsumoto et al [29] MEA, AMP À deMontigny et al [30] Water, MEA À Khaisri et al [31] PP NaOH solution + Rangwala [32] Alkanolamine solution + Falk-Pedersen and Dannström [27] + Kumar et al [33] Amino acid salts (potassium taurate ) + Kumar et al [33] NaOH solution, MEA solution + Matsumoto et al [32] Propylene carbonate + Dindore et al [1] Water, MEA + Khaisri et al [31] MEA, AMP + deMontigny et al [30] Activated absorbent + Lu et al [34] PE NaOH solution, MEA solution + Matsumoto et al [29] MEA + Nishikawa et al [2] PVDF 5% MEA +5% TEA À Yeon et al [35] Water, MEA + Khaisri et al [31] PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene; PP, polypropylene; PE, polyethylene; PVDF, polyvinylidene fluoride; MEA, monoethanolamine; AMP, 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol; MDEA; N-methyldiethanolamine; TEA, triethanolamine. [ 31] 82.2 -59.2 deMontigny et al [30] Maximum specific area (m 2 /m 3 ) 2855 1488 1340 Lee et al [36] 2752 -429 deMontigny et al [30] Cost (US $/m) 0.01 -23 deMontigny et al [30] 0.01 0.36 11.5 Khaisri et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,11] In addition, the occurrence of flooding and entrainment of the absorption liquid limits the process and the liquid and gas streams cannot be controlled independently. [12][13][14][15] Membrane technology is an attractive, energy and cost effective alternative for conventional absorption processes. [6,16] It is easy to scale-up and has a high area-to-volume ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28] Gas-liquid membrane contactors have a high operational flexibility as the gas and the liquid stream can be controlled independently. [13,27,29,30] This makes them a viable technology for gas-liquid contacting processes such as the separation of olefins and paraffins, [27,31,32] blood oxygenation, [33] and the separation of CO 2 from light gases. [25] The traditional solvents used for CO 2 absorption are aqueous alkanol amine solutions, such as monoethanolamine (MEA, Figure 2a), due to their high CO 2 absorption capacity and relatively high CO 2 absorption rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%